{"title":"Das grundfreiheitliche Gebot „Du sollst nicht diskriminieren“","authors":"Nils Grosche","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2022-3-213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the example of the ECJ's decision on the German infrastructure use charge for passenger vehicles (C-591/17), the article addresses methodological questions of indirect discrimination in the context of the EU`s fundamental freedoms. In doing so, the question is raised whether the construction of the passenger vehicle use charge is – due to the controversy – a legal example of what can be described as a reversible figure. The central thesis is that this impression only arises due to a certain methodological perspective. The impression of a reversible figure can be dissolved as a mere illusion if one broadens the methodological perspective for the understanding of indirect discrimination. Figuratively speaking, one has to take a step back and not only focus on the discriminatory character of the vehicle use charge.","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2022-3-213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Using the example of the ECJ's decision on the German infrastructure use charge for passenger vehicles (C-591/17), the article addresses methodological questions of indirect discrimination in the context of the EU`s fundamental freedoms. In doing so, the question is raised whether the construction of the passenger vehicle use charge is – due to the controversy – a legal example of what can be described as a reversible figure. The central thesis is that this impression only arises due to a certain methodological perspective. The impression of a reversible figure can be dissolved as a mere illusion if one broadens the methodological perspective for the understanding of indirect discrimination. Figuratively speaking, one has to take a step back and not only focus on the discriminatory character of the vehicle use charge.