KEEPING THE FAITH

Louis Kahn Pub Date : 2020-11-10 DOI:10.2307/j.ctv17mrtzm.6
Donna Bowman
{"title":"KEEPING THE FAITH","authors":"Donna Bowman","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv17mrtzm.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a review of Keeping the Faith (2000). This film review is available in Journal of Religion & Film: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol4/iss2/11 Edward Norton made a huge splash in the movie world when, in his 1996 debut Primal Fear, he showed his ability to elevate ordinary thriller material with electrifying acting. Since then, he's been doing prestige work, from singing and dancing for Woody Allen in Everybody Says I Love You, to portraying dark corners of the psyche in American History X and Fight Club. So why did he choose for his directorial debut a romantic comedy with a broad slapstick frame? Probably to do a favor for his friend, screenwriter Scott Blumberg. But given Norton's huge reputation as an acting talent, Keeping the Faith inevitably becomes a test of his ability to elevate light comedic material from behind the camera, as well as in front of it. The movie's premise reads like the opening to a bad joke—a priest and a rabbi open a bar—and Blumberg acknowledges that fact by bookending the plot with scenes of Norton's character, Father Brian Finn, pouring out his tale of woe to a bartender. Seems Brian and the rabbi, Jake Schram (Ben Stiller), were childhood friends with a girl named Anna (Jenna Elfman). After Anna moved away, Brian and Jake grew up and took their respective vows, doing their best to shake up their stodgy faiths with new ideas. Now Anna's back in New York as a high-powered corporate merger expert, and her old friends are wrestling with some more-thanfriends feelings for her, as they prepare to turn abandoned loft space into an interfaith nightspot. 1 Bowman: Keeping the Faith Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2000 Like the two lead characters who juggle spirituality and worldly concerns on a daily basis, Keeping the Faith has a split personality. On the one hand, it's a wacky comedy with pratfalls, sight gags, and of-the-moment cultural references. Much is made of Brian's clumsiness with the incense and Jake's queasiness at circumcisions. On the other hand, however, it is a straight-faced and rather earnest exploration of what the clergy owe to their God and their congregation. When Jake and Anna begin an affair, Jake wants to keep it secret both from Brian, because it might spoil their friendship, and from his synagogue, because he might be cast out for his traif romance. These considerations, and the heartache and embarrassment they cause, are not at all treated in a light comic style. And although that change of tone causes the film to exhibit signs of schizophrenia, Norton's decision to treat the problems of his characters seriously—as seriously as the characters themselves do—is refreshing. Even if Brian and Jake's crisis of faith is more about symbolism than concrete religious belief, at least there is an acknowledgement that these things ought to matter to these people, and that therefore they ought to matter to us. Norton has a long way to go as a director. But he does get great performances from Stiller and Elfman, something not every director has been able to do. And he deepens the bantering script by concentrating heavily—too heavily for the audience's taste, in all probability—on the threat to the characters' identity posed by Anna and her promise of conventional romantic love. Although they are 2 Journal of Religion & Film, Vol. 4 [2000], Iss. 2, Art. 11 https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol4/iss2/11 able easily to integrate all kinds of cultural phenomena, such as pop music and topical comedy, into their vocations, Jake and Brian struggle with the task of integrating love and sex in anything but traditional guises. Norton perceptively shows how threatening those deep feelings can be to the self-identity of religious professionals, however progressive. While unable to elevate either the comedic or the dramatic side of the story to unexpected heights, Norton nevertheless manages to communicate his enjoyment and engagement with both sides. A little technical training, and he just might have a second career. 3 Bowman: Keeping the Faith Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2000","PeriodicalId":446830,"journal":{"name":"Louis Kahn","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Louis Kahn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv17mrtzm.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a review of Keeping the Faith (2000). This film review is available in Journal of Religion & Film: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol4/iss2/11 Edward Norton made a huge splash in the movie world when, in his 1996 debut Primal Fear, he showed his ability to elevate ordinary thriller material with electrifying acting. Since then, he's been doing prestige work, from singing and dancing for Woody Allen in Everybody Says I Love You, to portraying dark corners of the psyche in American History X and Fight Club. So why did he choose for his directorial debut a romantic comedy with a broad slapstick frame? Probably to do a favor for his friend, screenwriter Scott Blumberg. But given Norton's huge reputation as an acting talent, Keeping the Faith inevitably becomes a test of his ability to elevate light comedic material from behind the camera, as well as in front of it. The movie's premise reads like the opening to a bad joke—a priest and a rabbi open a bar—and Blumberg acknowledges that fact by bookending the plot with scenes of Norton's character, Father Brian Finn, pouring out his tale of woe to a bartender. Seems Brian and the rabbi, Jake Schram (Ben Stiller), were childhood friends with a girl named Anna (Jenna Elfman). After Anna moved away, Brian and Jake grew up and took their respective vows, doing their best to shake up their stodgy faiths with new ideas. Now Anna's back in New York as a high-powered corporate merger expert, and her old friends are wrestling with some more-thanfriends feelings for her, as they prepare to turn abandoned loft space into an interfaith nightspot. 1 Bowman: Keeping the Faith Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2000 Like the two lead characters who juggle spirituality and worldly concerns on a daily basis, Keeping the Faith has a split personality. On the one hand, it's a wacky comedy with pratfalls, sight gags, and of-the-moment cultural references. Much is made of Brian's clumsiness with the incense and Jake's queasiness at circumcisions. On the other hand, however, it is a straight-faced and rather earnest exploration of what the clergy owe to their God and their congregation. When Jake and Anna begin an affair, Jake wants to keep it secret both from Brian, because it might spoil their friendship, and from his synagogue, because he might be cast out for his traif romance. These considerations, and the heartache and embarrassment they cause, are not at all treated in a light comic style. And although that change of tone causes the film to exhibit signs of schizophrenia, Norton's decision to treat the problems of his characters seriously—as seriously as the characters themselves do—is refreshing. Even if Brian and Jake's crisis of faith is more about symbolism than concrete religious belief, at least there is an acknowledgement that these things ought to matter to these people, and that therefore they ought to matter to us. Norton has a long way to go as a director. But he does get great performances from Stiller and Elfman, something not every director has been able to do. And he deepens the bantering script by concentrating heavily—too heavily for the audience's taste, in all probability—on the threat to the characters' identity posed by Anna and her promise of conventional romantic love. Although they are 2 Journal of Religion & Film, Vol. 4 [2000], Iss. 2, Art. 11 https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol4/iss2/11 able easily to integrate all kinds of cultural phenomena, such as pop music and topical comedy, into their vocations, Jake and Brian struggle with the task of integrating love and sex in anything but traditional guises. Norton perceptively shows how threatening those deep feelings can be to the self-identity of religious professionals, however progressive. While unable to elevate either the comedic or the dramatic side of the story to unexpected heights, Norton nevertheless manages to communicate his enjoyment and engagement with both sides. A little technical training, and he just might have a second career. 3 Bowman: Keeping the Faith Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2000
坚守信仰
这是对《保持信仰》(2000)的回顾。这篇影评可以在《宗教与电影杂志》上找到:https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol4/iss2/11爱德华·诺顿在1996年的处女作《原始恐惧》中引起了电影界的巨大轰动,他展示了自己用令人兴奋的表演提升普通惊悚片的能力。从那以后,他一直在做一些有声望的工作,从为伍迪·艾伦在《人人都说我爱你》中唱歌跳舞,到在《美国历史X》和《搏击俱乐部》中描绘心灵的黑暗角落。那么,为什么他的导演处女作选择了一部带有广泛闹剧框架的浪漫喜剧呢?可能是为了帮他的朋友,编剧斯科特·布隆伯格一个忙。但鉴于诺顿在表演上的天赋,《坚守信仰》不可避免地成为了对他在幕后和台前提升轻喜剧素材能力的考验。电影的开头读起来就像一个糟糕的笑话——牧师和拉比开了一家酒吧——布隆伯格承认了这一事实,他在结尾用了诺顿饰演的布莱恩·芬恩神父向酒保倾诉他的悲伤故事的场景。似乎布莱恩和拉比杰克·施拉姆(本·斯蒂勒饰)是一个叫安娜(詹娜·艾尔夫曼饰)的女孩的童年朋友。安娜搬走后,布莱恩和杰克长大了,各自立下了誓言,尽最大努力用新思想来动摇他们陈旧的信仰。现在,安娜回到了纽约,成为了一名权力巨大的公司合并专家,她的老朋友们正纠结于对她的一种超越朋友的感情,他们准备把一个废弃的阁楼空间变成一个跨宗教的夜总会。鲍曼:保持信仰,DigitalCommons@UNO出版,2000年,就像两个主角一样,他们每天都在精神和世俗的事务之间徘徊,保持信仰有一个分裂的人格。一方面,这是一部古怪的喜剧,充满了闹剧、视觉插科打诨和当下的文化参考。很多都是由布莱恩的笨拙与香和杰克的恶心割礼。另一方面,它严肃而认真地探讨了神职人员对上帝和会众的亏欠。当杰克和安娜开始婚外情时,杰克既不想让布莱恩知道,因为这可能会破坏他们的友谊,也不想让他的犹太教堂知道,因为他可能会因为他的火车恋情而被驱逐。这些考虑,以及它们引起的心痛和尴尬,根本不是用轻松的喜剧风格来处理的。尽管这种基调的改变让影片呈现出精神分裂的迹象,但诺顿决定严肃对待他的角色的问题——就像角色本身一样严肃——令人耳目一新。即使布莱恩和杰克的信仰危机更多的是象征意义,而不是具体的宗教信仰,但至少我们认识到,这些东西对这些人来说应该很重要,因此对我们来说也应该很重要。作为导演,诺顿还有很长的路要走。但他确实从斯蒂勒和艾夫曼那里得到了出色的表演,这不是每个导演都能做到的。此外,他还将戏谑的剧本进一步深化,把重点放在了安娜对角色身份构成的威胁以及她对传统浪漫爱情的承诺上,这很可能对观众的口味来说太重了。虽然他们是《宗教与电影杂志》[2000]第4卷,第2期,第11章https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol4/iss2/11,能够轻松地将各种文化现象,如流行音乐和时事喜剧,融入他们的职业,但杰克和布莱恩努力将爱和性融入任何东西,而不是传统的伪装。诺顿敏锐地展示了这些深刻的情感是如何威胁到宗教专业人士的自我认同,无论他们多么进步。虽然诺顿无法将故事的喜剧和戏剧性的一面提升到意想不到的高度,但他还是成功地将他的乐趣和参与传达给了这两个方面。接受一点技术培训,他可能会有第二职业。3 .鲍曼:保持信仰DigitalCommons@UNO, 2000年出版
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信