Paper Review Samples

Abstract

 1. Is the paper relevant to the conference topics? o very relevant  2. Is there any originality of the presented work? (5: high originality, ... 1: no originality) o (5)  3. How can you rate the structure of the paper? (5: well, ..., 1: poor) o (4)  4. How do you rate the appropriateness of the research/study method? ( 5: excellent,..., 1:poor) o (4)  5. How do you rate the relevance and clarity of drawings, figures and tables? ( 5: excellent, 1: poor) o (4)  6. How do you rate the appropriateness of the abstract as a description of the paper? ( 5: excellent, ..., 1:poor) o (4)  7. Are references adequate? recent? and correctly cited? (5: excellent,..., 1:poor) o (4)  8. Are discussions and conclusions appropriate? (5: excellent, ..., 1: poor) o (4)  9. Please, add some comments on the paper if you have any. o The paper is well written. Authors address the problem of audio signal augmentation based on Trans-GAN.