RELIABLE ENTERPRISE VALUATION METHODS: A CASE STUDY ON ROMANIA’S INVESTMENT FUNDS

Vlad Bulău
{"title":"RELIABLE ENTERPRISE VALUATION METHODS: A CASE STUDY ON ROMANIA’S INVESTMENT FUNDS","authors":"Vlad Bulău","doi":"10.46827/ejefr.v6i2.1298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professionals in enterprise valuation can use multiple methods and approaches for the valuation mission. To support them, the standards in the matter use the market approach, income approach, and cost approach. The market approach or comparison approach refers to determining the value of an entity or the common equity of an entity using direct comparison with other enterprises or similar shares traded on the free market (the price of which is public). The sources of information concerning such data are mainly the stock exchanges and the M&A (mergers and acquisitions) operations and preceding transactions with similar companies. The most common multiples in the market-based approach are PER (Price Earnings Ratio), PEG (Price Earnings to Growth), and EV/EBITDA. Within this study, we highlighted the extent to which these multiples reflect or not the market value of the companies analysed, as defined by the stock exchange mechanism. Furthermore, to achieve this goal we set out to establish the validity of three hypotheses regarding the ability of multiple-based methods to highlight a stock’s market price. Using a quantitative approach and historical data we demonstrated that market-based multiples are a safe way to obtain an enterprise’s fair value, pointing out that results vary slightly depending on the variables used. JEL: M40, M41, M49  Article visualizations:","PeriodicalId":376871,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Economic and Financial Research","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Economic and Financial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46827/ejefr.v6i2.1298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professionals in enterprise valuation can use multiple methods and approaches for the valuation mission. To support them, the standards in the matter use the market approach, income approach, and cost approach. The market approach or comparison approach refers to determining the value of an entity or the common equity of an entity using direct comparison with other enterprises or similar shares traded on the free market (the price of which is public). The sources of information concerning such data are mainly the stock exchanges and the M&A (mergers and acquisitions) operations and preceding transactions with similar companies. The most common multiples in the market-based approach are PER (Price Earnings Ratio), PEG (Price Earnings to Growth), and EV/EBITDA. Within this study, we highlighted the extent to which these multiples reflect or not the market value of the companies analysed, as defined by the stock exchange mechanism. Furthermore, to achieve this goal we set out to establish the validity of three hypotheses regarding the ability of multiple-based methods to highlight a stock’s market price. Using a quantitative approach and historical data we demonstrated that market-based multiples are a safe way to obtain an enterprise’s fair value, pointing out that results vary slightly depending on the variables used. JEL: M40, M41, M49  Article visualizations:
可靠的企业估值方法:以罗马尼亚投资基金为例
企业估值专业人员可以使用多种方法和途径来完成估值任务。为了支持它们,有关标准使用了市场方法、收入方法和成本方法。市场法或比较法是指通过与自由市场上交易的其他企业或类似股票(其价格是公开的)的直接比较来确定实体或实体的普通股权益的价值。这些数据的信息来源主要是证券交易所、并购业务和与同类公司的前期交易。基于市场的方法中最常见的倍数是PER(市盈率)、PEG(市盈率增长比)和EV/EBITDA。在这项研究中,我们强调了这些倍数在多大程度上反映了所分析公司的市场价值,这是由证券交易机制定义的。此外,为了实现这一目标,我们着手建立关于多基础方法突出股票市场价格能力的三个假设的有效性。通过定量方法和历史数据,我们证明了基于市场的倍数是获得企业公允价值的安全方法,并指出结果会因所使用的变量而略有不同。JEL: M40, M41, M49文章可视化:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书