Action Quality Assessment Across Multiple Actions

Paritosh Parmar, B. Morris
{"title":"Action Quality Assessment Across Multiple Actions","authors":"Paritosh Parmar, B. Morris","doi":"10.1109/WACV.2019.00161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can learning to measure the quality of an action help in measuring the quality of other actions? If so, can consolidated samples from multiple actions help improve the performance of current approaches? In this paper, we carry out experiments to see if knowledge transfer is possible in the action quality assessment (AQA) setting. Experiments are carried out on our newly released AQA dataset (http://rtis.oit.unlv.edu/datasets.html) consisting of 1106 action samples from seven actions with quality as measured by expert human judges. Our experimental results show that there is utility in learning a single model across multiple actions.","PeriodicalId":436637,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"78","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2019.00161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

Abstract

Can learning to measure the quality of an action help in measuring the quality of other actions? If so, can consolidated samples from multiple actions help improve the performance of current approaches? In this paper, we carry out experiments to see if knowledge transfer is possible in the action quality assessment (AQA) setting. Experiments are carried out on our newly released AQA dataset (http://rtis.oit.unlv.edu/datasets.html) consisting of 1106 action samples from seven actions with quality as measured by expert human judges. Our experimental results show that there is utility in learning a single model across multiple actions.
跨多个行动的行动质量评估
学会衡量一个行为的质量是否有助于衡量其他行为的质量?如果是这样,来自多个操作的合并样本是否有助于改进当前方法的性能?在本文中,我们进行了实验,看看知识转移是否可能在行动质量评估(AQA)设置。实验在我们新发布的AQA数据集(http://rtis.oit.unlv.edu/datasets.html)上进行,该数据集由7个动作的1106个动作样本组成,这些动作的质量由人类专家判断。我们的实验结果表明,跨多个动作学习单个模型是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信