Simon Ackermann, A. Szabo, S. Paulus, Florian Steinke
{"title":"Comparison of Two Day-Ahead Offering Strategies for a Flexible CHP Plant in Germany","authors":"Simon Ackermann, A. Szabo, S. Paulus, Florian Steinke","doi":"10.1109/ISGTEurope.2019.8905452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two different day-ahead bidding strategies for a flexible combined heat and power plant are discussed. The plant portfolio consists of multiple combined heat and power units, a heat storage, gas boilers and an electric boiler. The first strategy relies on two-stage stochastic optimization which uses scenarios for electricity prices and thermal loads as inputs. The second “flat-bidding” strategy uses deterministic forecasts for electricity prices and thermal load. The performance of the two strategies is evaluated for four months in 2016 by consecutively simulating the day-ahead auction participation and subsequent plant operation. Both strategies are benchmarked against a perfect information optimization. The stochastic optimization decreases the costs in the range of +4 to −1 percent compared to the flat bidding scheme yet requiring excessively more computation time.","PeriodicalId":305933,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT-Europe)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT-Europe)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEurope.2019.8905452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Two different day-ahead bidding strategies for a flexible combined heat and power plant are discussed. The plant portfolio consists of multiple combined heat and power units, a heat storage, gas boilers and an electric boiler. The first strategy relies on two-stage stochastic optimization which uses scenarios for electricity prices and thermal loads as inputs. The second “flat-bidding” strategy uses deterministic forecasts for electricity prices and thermal load. The performance of the two strategies is evaluated for four months in 2016 by consecutively simulating the day-ahead auction participation and subsequent plant operation. Both strategies are benchmarked against a perfect information optimization. The stochastic optimization decreases the costs in the range of +4 to −1 percent compared to the flat bidding scheme yet requiring excessively more computation time.