Recognition of Narrators in Sahih Al-Bukhari, Views of Hafiz Ibn Hajar and Imam Al-Kermani ( A Critical Comparative Study)

Mati ur Rehman, F. Gorashi
{"title":"Recognition of Narrators in Sahih Al-Bukhari, Views of Hafiz Ibn Hajar and Imam Al-Kermani ( A Critical Comparative Study)","authors":"Mati ur Rehman, F. Gorashi","doi":"10.37556/al-idah.039.02.0713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sahih al-Bukhari by Imam  Abu Abdullah Mohammad al-Bukhari stands next to the Holy Quran as a primary authentic source of Islam.“Al Kawakib ad Durari” by Imam al-kirmani is an important explanation of Sahih Bukhari. In “Fath al Bari” Al Hafiz Ibn e Hajar critically comments on Al Kirmani which form the basis of this article. Hereby a comparative analysis of the viewpoint of both Imams is being offered.","PeriodicalId":159824,"journal":{"name":"Al-Idah","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Idah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.039.02.0713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sahih al-Bukhari by Imam  Abu Abdullah Mohammad al-Bukhari stands next to the Holy Quran as a primary authentic source of Islam.“Al Kawakib ad Durari” by Imam al-kirmani is an important explanation of Sahih Bukhari. In “Fath al Bari” Al Hafiz Ibn e Hajar critically comments on Al Kirmani which form the basis of this article. Hereby a comparative analysis of the viewpoint of both Imams is being offered.
对《布哈里圣训》叙述者的认识——哈菲兹·伊本·哈贾尔与伊玛目·克尔马尼的观点(批判性比较研究)
伊玛目阿布·阿卜杜拉·穆罕默德·布哈里的《布哈里圣训》与《古兰经》并列,是伊斯兰教的主要真实来源。伊玛目基尔马尼的《Al Kawakib and Durari》是对布哈里圣训的重要解释。在" Fath al Bari "中,al Hafiz Ibn e Hajar对al Kirmani的批判性评论构成了本文的基础。在此,对两位伊玛目的观点进行比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信