The Social Origins of Materialism and Socialism

C. Robinson
{"title":"The Social Origins of Materialism and Socialism","authors":"C. Robinson","doi":"10.5149/northcarolina/9781469649917.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, Robinson takes on what he sees as Marx’s fallacious assumption that socialism requires the existence of full-blown capitalism. Instead, Robinson explores the history of materialism and political economy in Europe in relation to late medieval Christianity and the Roman Church as a way to uncover other lineages of Western socialism. He traces the genealogy of materialism upon which Marx himself relied—drawing from German idealists and eighteenth century bourgeois ideas—and contrasts this with an alternative genealogy of modern materialist discourse (Aristotelianism, Dualism, Classical materialism, historical materialism). He shows how bourgeois resistance against the Church’s political order in the thirteenth century took the form of socialist communities. This socialist-oriented resistance was then repressed and co-opted by Church leaders before reappearing in the popular impulses of the French Revolution, eventually leading to Marx’s secular expression of socialism. Robinson argues that Marxism ignores this history of non-industrial socialism, accepting many assumptions of bourgeois historiography and leading him to assume that full industrial, bourgeois society is necessary to the establishment of socialism. This effaces the thirteenth century precedents to nineteenth century Western socialism.","PeriodicalId":429391,"journal":{"name":"An Anthropology of Marxism","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"An Anthropology of Marxism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469649917.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this chapter, Robinson takes on what he sees as Marx’s fallacious assumption that socialism requires the existence of full-blown capitalism. Instead, Robinson explores the history of materialism and political economy in Europe in relation to late medieval Christianity and the Roman Church as a way to uncover other lineages of Western socialism. He traces the genealogy of materialism upon which Marx himself relied—drawing from German idealists and eighteenth century bourgeois ideas—and contrasts this with an alternative genealogy of modern materialist discourse (Aristotelianism, Dualism, Classical materialism, historical materialism). He shows how bourgeois resistance against the Church’s political order in the thirteenth century took the form of socialist communities. This socialist-oriented resistance was then repressed and co-opted by Church leaders before reappearing in the popular impulses of the French Revolution, eventually leading to Marx’s secular expression of socialism. Robinson argues that Marxism ignores this history of non-industrial socialism, accepting many assumptions of bourgeois historiography and leading him to assume that full industrial, bourgeois society is necessary to the establishment of socialism. This effaces the thirteenth century precedents to nineteenth century Western socialism.
唯物主义和社会主义的社会起源
在这一章中,鲁滨逊提出了马克思的错误假设,即社会主义需要成熟的资本主义的存在。相反,罗宾逊将欧洲唯物主义和政治经济学的历史与中世纪晚期基督教和罗马教会联系起来,作为揭示西方社会主义其他谱系的一种方式。他追溯了马克思本人所依赖的唯物主义谱系——借鉴了德国唯心主义者和18世纪资产阶级思想——并将其与现代唯物主义话语的另一种谱系(亚里士多德主义、二元论、古典唯物主义、历史唯物主义)进行了对比。他展示了13世纪资产阶级如何以社会主义社区的形式反抗教会的政治秩序。这种以社会主义为导向的抵抗后来被教会领导人压制和吸收,然后在法国大革命的流行冲动中重新出现,最终导致马克思对社会主义的世俗表达。鲁宾逊认为,马克思主义忽略了这段非工业社会主义的历史,接受了资产阶级史学的许多假设,并使他认为,要建立社会主义,完全工业化的资产阶级社会是必要的。这抹煞了13世纪对19世纪西方社会主义的先例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信