The Impact of Negation on the Complexity of the Shapley Value in Conjunctive Queries

A. Reshef, B. Kimelfeld, Ester Livshits
{"title":"The Impact of Negation on the Complexity of the Shapley Value in Conjunctive Queries","authors":"A. Reshef, B. Kimelfeld, Ester Livshits","doi":"10.1145/3375395.3387664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Shapley value is a conventional and well-studied function for determining the contribution of a player to the coalition in a cooperative game. Among its applications in a plethora of domains, it has recently been proposed to use the Shapley value for quantifying the contribution of a tuple to the result of a database query. In particular, we have a thorough understanding of the tractability frontier for the class of Conjunctive Queries (CQs) and aggregate functions over CQs. It has also been established that a tractable (randomized) multiplicative approximation exists for every union of CQs. Nevertheless, all of these results are based on the monotonicity of CQs. In this work, we investigate the implication of negation on the complexity of Shapley computation, in both the exact and approximate senses. We generalize a known dichotomy to account for negated atoms. We also show that negation fundamentally changes the complexity of approximation. We do so by drawing a connection to the problem of deciding whether a tuple is \"relevant\" to a query, and by analyzing its complexity.","PeriodicalId":412441,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 39th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 39th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3375395.3387664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The Shapley value is a conventional and well-studied function for determining the contribution of a player to the coalition in a cooperative game. Among its applications in a plethora of domains, it has recently been proposed to use the Shapley value for quantifying the contribution of a tuple to the result of a database query. In particular, we have a thorough understanding of the tractability frontier for the class of Conjunctive Queries (CQs) and aggregate functions over CQs. It has also been established that a tractable (randomized) multiplicative approximation exists for every union of CQs. Nevertheless, all of these results are based on the monotonicity of CQs. In this work, we investigate the implication of negation on the complexity of Shapley computation, in both the exact and approximate senses. We generalize a known dichotomy to account for negated atoms. We also show that negation fundamentally changes the complexity of approximation. We do so by drawing a connection to the problem of deciding whether a tuple is "relevant" to a query, and by analyzing its complexity.
否定对连接查询中Shapley值复杂度的影响
Shapley值是一个传统的、研究得很好的函数,用于确定合作博弈中参与者对联盟的贡献。在其在众多领域的应用中,最近有人提出使用Shapley值来量化元组对数据库查询结果的贡献。特别是,我们对连接查询(cq)类和cq上的聚合函数的可跟踪性边界有了透彻的理解。我们还证明了对于cq的每一个并存在一个可处理的(随机的)乘法近似。然而,所有这些结果都是基于cq的单调性。在这项工作中,我们在精确和近似意义上研究否定对沙普利计算复杂性的影响。我们推广一种已知的二分法来解释带负电的原子。我们还表明,否定从根本上改变了近似的复杂性。我们通过与确定元组是否与查询“相关”的问题建立联系,并通过分析其复杂性来做到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信