Afterword

Sian Lazar
{"title":"Afterword","authors":"Sian Lazar","doi":"10.1017/9781139565981.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter summarizes the findings on authorship controversies. It highlights the extent to which false or not genuine attributions without intent to deceive has been made or claimed. It also explains the three categories of attribution: genuine attribution, false attribution with intent to deceive, and false attribution without intent to deceive. The chapter analyzes the basic principles for authorship studies and compares similarities in the types of arguments used by the defenders of the traditional attributions to Ivan IV, Andrei Kurbskii, and William Shakespeare. It also concentrates on issues of attribution and misattribution, which involve accusations of forgery and plagiarism, as well as the question of who the author was.","PeriodicalId":120269,"journal":{"name":"Wyndham Lewis's Cultural Criticism and the Infrastructures of Patronage","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wyndham Lewis's Cultural Criticism and the Infrastructures of Patronage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139565981.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the findings on authorship controversies. It highlights the extent to which false or not genuine attributions without intent to deceive has been made or claimed. It also explains the three categories of attribution: genuine attribution, false attribution with intent to deceive, and false attribution without intent to deceive. The chapter analyzes the basic principles for authorship studies and compares similarities in the types of arguments used by the defenders of the traditional attributions to Ivan IV, Andrei Kurbskii, and William Shakespeare. It also concentrates on issues of attribution and misattribution, which involve accusations of forgery and plagiarism, as well as the question of who the author was.
后记
本章总结了作者身份争议的研究结果。它强调了在没有欺骗意图的情况下做出或声称的虚假或不真实归因的程度。并解释了归因的三种类型:真实归因、有欺骗意图的虚假归因和无欺骗意图的虚假归因。本章分析了作者身份研究的基本原则,并比较了伊万四世、安德烈·库尔布斯基和威廉·莎士比亚传统归属的捍卫者所使用的论点类型的相似性。它还集中在署名和错误署名的问题上,涉及伪造和抄袭的指控,以及作者是谁的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信