Consistency of Pecking Order Theory: Evidence from Indonesia Capital Market

Ruswiati Suryasaputra Indahwati
{"title":"Consistency of Pecking Order Theory: Evidence from Indonesia Capital Market","authors":"Ruswiati Suryasaputra Indahwati","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3801506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial crisis in some developing country have affected Indonesia as a developing country as well. It changes business climate that force firms finds additional funding sources. Improper capital structure policy will give negative signal to investors about firm’s financial performance and future prospect, which in turn affects stock price of the firm. Pecking Order Theory states that firms has defined yet the target debt ratio and that companies prefer to use internal financing first, then debt, and finally new equity. This research aims to test consistency of pecking order theory in term of flexibility of capital structure policy of listed companies in Indonesian Capital Market in the crisis circumstances. And analyze testing the influence on the value of the firm. Research population is taken from public listed company in Indonesia capital market since 2015-2018 with assets worth 1 thousand million. Data analyzing technique to answer the research question and analyze the research hypothesis uses factor analysis and simple linear regression. The result shows that is proved that there is consistency of influence POT/pecking order theory policy on the value of the firm in Indonesian Capital Market since 2015 to 2018.","PeriodicalId":153840,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Markets: Finance eJournal","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Markets: Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3801506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Financial crisis in some developing country have affected Indonesia as a developing country as well. It changes business climate that force firms finds additional funding sources. Improper capital structure policy will give negative signal to investors about firm’s financial performance and future prospect, which in turn affects stock price of the firm. Pecking Order Theory states that firms has defined yet the target debt ratio and that companies prefer to use internal financing first, then debt, and finally new equity. This research aims to test consistency of pecking order theory in term of flexibility of capital structure policy of listed companies in Indonesian Capital Market in the crisis circumstances. And analyze testing the influence on the value of the firm. Research population is taken from public listed company in Indonesia capital market since 2015-2018 with assets worth 1 thousand million. Data analyzing technique to answer the research question and analyze the research hypothesis uses factor analysis and simple linear regression. The result shows that is proved that there is consistency of influence POT/pecking order theory policy on the value of the firm in Indonesian Capital Market since 2015 to 2018.
啄序一致性理论:来自印尼资本市场的证据
一些发展中国家的金融危机也影响到印尼这个发展中国家。它改变了商业环境,迫使公司寻找额外的资金来源。不当的资本结构政策会向投资者发出有关企业财务业绩和未来前景的负面信号,进而影响企业股价。Pecking Order理论指出,公司已经确定了目标负债率,公司倾向于首先使用内部融资,然后是债务,最后是新股本。本研究旨在检验在危机环境下印尼资本市场上市公司资本结构政策灵活性的啄序理论的一致性。并分析测试对公司价值的影响。研究对象为2015-2018年印尼资本市场上市公司,总资产10亿元。数据分析技术采用因子分析和简单线性回归来回答研究问题和分析研究假设。结果表明,2015 - 2018年印尼资本市场上POT/啄食序理论政策对企业价值的影响存在一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信