The Degree of Machiavellianism of Henry Kissinger in the Framework of the Interpretation of Key Aspects of Richelieu's Foreign Policy Strategy

S. Saranov
{"title":"The Degree of Machiavellianism of Henry Kissinger in the Framework of the Interpretation of Key Aspects of Richelieu's Foreign Policy Strategy","authors":"S. Saranov","doi":"10.21272/starovyna.2023.62.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the key aspects of Richelieu's foreign policy strategy within the framework of Henry Kissinger's interpretation. The author states the topical nature of this issue since the historical heritage of Richelieu is one of those components that are among the most significant elements of the concept of \"world order\" in its historical interpretation.\nThe author emphasizes that Kissinger's assessments are stable and consistent. Therefore, for example, in an interview in the 70s of the XX century, he distanced himself from the influence of Machiavelli's ideas on his scientific concepts. Then, in his scientific works of the later period, primarily in «Diplomacy» and «World Order», he systematized in a more precise form his own interpretation of Richelieu's foreign policy legacy, tying his assessments to the concept of a \"long-term strategic concept\", and not in the spirit of Machiavelli to the concept \"manipulation of political power\".\nThe author of the article draws attention to the correctness of the key aspects of Kissinger's interpretation, and the stability of his assessments, reflecting the conceptual integrity of the author's concept of the American researcher in this matter.","PeriodicalId":332840,"journal":{"name":"Sums'ka Starovyna (Ancient Sumy Land)","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sums'ka Starovyna (Ancient Sumy Land)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21272/starovyna.2023.62.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the key aspects of Richelieu's foreign policy strategy within the framework of Henry Kissinger's interpretation. The author states the topical nature of this issue since the historical heritage of Richelieu is one of those components that are among the most significant elements of the concept of "world order" in its historical interpretation. The author emphasizes that Kissinger's assessments are stable and consistent. Therefore, for example, in an interview in the 70s of the XX century, he distanced himself from the influence of Machiavelli's ideas on his scientific concepts. Then, in his scientific works of the later period, primarily in «Diplomacy» and «World Order», he systematized in a more precise form his own interpretation of Richelieu's foreign policy legacy, tying his assessments to the concept of a "long-term strategic concept", and not in the spirit of Machiavelli to the concept "manipulation of political power". The author of the article draws attention to the correctness of the key aspects of Kissinger's interpretation, and the stability of his assessments, reflecting the conceptual integrity of the author's concept of the American researcher in this matter.
亨利·基辛格的马基雅维利主义程度——从黎塞留外交政策战略关键方面的解读看
本文致力于在亨利·基辛格的解释框架内探讨黎塞留外交政策战略的关键方面。作者陈述了这个问题的主题性质,因为黎塞留的历史遗产是其历史解释中“世界秩序”概念中最重要的组成部分之一。作者强调,基辛格的评估是稳定和一致的。因此,例如,在20世纪70年代的一次采访中,他疏远了马基雅维利的思想对他的科学概念的影响。然后,在他后期的科学著作中,主要是在《外交》和《世界秩序》中,他以一种更精确的形式系统化了他自己对黎塞留外交政策遗产的解释,将他的评估与“长期战略概念”的概念联系起来,而不是按照马基雅维利的精神与“政治权力操纵”的概念联系起来。文章的作者提请注意基辛格解释的关键方面的正确性,以及他的评估的稳定性,反映了作者在这个问题上对美国研究者概念的概念完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信