{"title":"Electrophysiology and Behavior of Cnidarian Nervous Systems","authors":"R. Meech","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190264086.013.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the Cnidaria have evolved a wide range of body forms matched with an equally varied neural anatomy, individual species exhibit common patterns of behavior. For example, in all species a key challenge for the nervous system is to transfer food from the peripherally mounted tentacles to the centrally located stomach. Foraging movements, necessary to maintain the food supply, must be accomplished in such a way as to avoid interference with the primary objective of getting prey into the mouth. Furthermore, the hunt for prey must be balanced by a measured response to “threat.” Different species respond to threat in markedly different ways, but in each case foraging is inhibited, just as it is during transmission of food.\n One hundred years ago, G. H. Parker questioned whether a centralized or a locally organized nervous system could best account for sea anemone behavior. Anatomical and electrophysiological studies now suggest that in most Cnidaria there is a degree of hierarchical control, with local reflexes coordinated by more condensed systems of neurons. This organization is highly developed in the nerve rings of hydrozoan medusae and takes the form of ganglion-like rhopalia in the Cubozoa. Even in hydrozoan polyps such as Hydra there are at least four separate neuronal systems. It is likely that the underlying mechanisms (containing both homologous and analogous elements) will be best revealed by a comparative approach that directly relates behavior with its molecular basis. Useful examples include comparisons between sea anemones with and without through-conducting systems; between hydra with and without oral rings; between medusae with and without coordinated escape swimming. Recent advances in transgenomic labeling have shown the way forward.","PeriodicalId":216585,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264086.013.146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Although the Cnidaria have evolved a wide range of body forms matched with an equally varied neural anatomy, individual species exhibit common patterns of behavior. For example, in all species a key challenge for the nervous system is to transfer food from the peripherally mounted tentacles to the centrally located stomach. Foraging movements, necessary to maintain the food supply, must be accomplished in such a way as to avoid interference with the primary objective of getting prey into the mouth. Furthermore, the hunt for prey must be balanced by a measured response to “threat.” Different species respond to threat in markedly different ways, but in each case foraging is inhibited, just as it is during transmission of food.
One hundred years ago, G. H. Parker questioned whether a centralized or a locally organized nervous system could best account for sea anemone behavior. Anatomical and electrophysiological studies now suggest that in most Cnidaria there is a degree of hierarchical control, with local reflexes coordinated by more condensed systems of neurons. This organization is highly developed in the nerve rings of hydrozoan medusae and takes the form of ganglion-like rhopalia in the Cubozoa. Even in hydrozoan polyps such as Hydra there are at least four separate neuronal systems. It is likely that the underlying mechanisms (containing both homologous and analogous elements) will be best revealed by a comparative approach that directly relates behavior with its molecular basis. Useful examples include comparisons between sea anemones with and without through-conducting systems; between hydra with and without oral rings; between medusae with and without coordinated escape swimming. Recent advances in transgenomic labeling have shown the way forward.
尽管刺胞动物已经进化出了多种多样的身体形态,与之相匹配的是同样多样的神经解剖结构,但单个物种表现出共同的行为模式。例如,在所有物种中,神经系统面临的一个关键挑战是将食物从周围的触手转移到位于中央的胃中。维持食物供应所必需的觅食动作,必须以这样一种方式完成,即避免干扰将猎物送入口中的主要目标。此外,对猎物的捕猎必须与对“威胁”有节制的反应相平衡。不同的物种以明显不同的方式应对威胁,但在每种情况下,觅食都受到抑制,就像在食物传播过程中一样。一百年前,g·h·帕克(G. H. Parker)质疑,究竟是集中组织的神经系统还是局部组织的神经系统最能解释海葵的行为。解剖学和电生理学的研究现在表明,在大多数刺胞动物中存在一定程度的层次控制,局部反射由更密集的神经元系统协调。这种组织在水母类水螅动物的神经环中高度发达,在长毛动物中表现为神经节状的喉状体。即使在水螅类动物息肉中,如九头蛇,也至少有四个独立的神经系统。潜在的机制(包含同源和类似的元素)很可能通过直接将行为与其分子基础联系起来的比较方法得到最好的揭示。有用的例子包括比较有和没有通导系统的海葵;有和没有口腔环的九头蛇之间;水母之间有和没有协调的逃生游泳。转基因标记的最新进展显示了前进的方向。