A comparison of preoperative hypoalbuminaemia with the NNIS and SENIC risk scores for the prediction of surgical site infection in a South African setting

N. Naidoo, T. Madiba, Y. Moodley
{"title":"A comparison of preoperative hypoalbuminaemia with the NNIS and SENIC risk scores for the prediction of surgical site infection in a South African setting","authors":"N. Naidoo, T. Madiba, Y. Moodley","doi":"10.36303/jmlstsa.2020.2.1.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Preoperative hypoalbuminaemia is a risk factor for surgical site infection (SSI) in the South African (SA) setting. However, the predictive accuracy of preoperative hypoalbuminaemia has not been tested against established SSI risk stratification models in our setting, which could have important implications for SSI prevention strategies. With reference to SSI in SA settings, the study objective was to compare the overall predictive accuracy of preoperative hypoalbuminaemia with that obtained for the SENIC/NNIS risk scores.\n\nMethod: This was a sub-analysis of a pre-existing laparotomy patient registry (N = 439). Variables collected as part of the registry included preoperative serum albumin measurements and all parameters of the SENIC/NNIS risk scores. Preoperative hypoalbuminaemia was defined as preoperative serum albumin of < 30 g/L. The study outcome was SSI up to 30 days postoperatively. Overall predictive accuracy was determined through a receiver operator-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with results presented as C-statistics (95% confidence intervals [CI]).\n\nResults: The C-statistics obtained for preoperative hypoalbuminaemia, the SENIC risk score, and the NNIS risk score were 0.677 (CI: 0.609–0.746), 0.652 (CI: 0.582–0.721), and 0.634 (CI: 0.563–0.705).\n\nConclusion: All three methods display similar predictive accuracy for SSI. However, preoperative hypoalbuminaemia has several practical advantages over the SENIC/NNIS scores which must be considered.","PeriodicalId":332687,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Laboratory Science & Technology of South Africa","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Laboratory Science & Technology of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36303/jmlstsa.2020.2.1.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Preoperative hypoalbuminaemia is a risk factor for surgical site infection (SSI) in the South African (SA) setting. However, the predictive accuracy of preoperative hypoalbuminaemia has not been tested against established SSI risk stratification models in our setting, which could have important implications for SSI prevention strategies. With reference to SSI in SA settings, the study objective was to compare the overall predictive accuracy of preoperative hypoalbuminaemia with that obtained for the SENIC/NNIS risk scores. Method: This was a sub-analysis of a pre-existing laparotomy patient registry (N = 439). Variables collected as part of the registry included preoperative serum albumin measurements and all parameters of the SENIC/NNIS risk scores. Preoperative hypoalbuminaemia was defined as preoperative serum albumin of < 30 g/L. The study outcome was SSI up to 30 days postoperatively. Overall predictive accuracy was determined through a receiver operator-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with results presented as C-statistics (95% confidence intervals [CI]). Results: The C-statistics obtained for preoperative hypoalbuminaemia, the SENIC risk score, and the NNIS risk score were 0.677 (CI: 0.609–0.746), 0.652 (CI: 0.582–0.721), and 0.634 (CI: 0.563–0.705). Conclusion: All three methods display similar predictive accuracy for SSI. However, preoperative hypoalbuminaemia has several practical advantages over the SENIC/NNIS scores which must be considered.
术前低白蛋白血症与预测南非手术部位感染的NNIS和SENIC风险评分的比较
前言:术前低白蛋白血症是南非(SA)手术部位感染(SSI)的危险因素。然而,术前低白蛋白血症的预测准确性尚未在我们的环境中对已建立的SSI风险分层模型进行测试,这可能对SSI预防策略具有重要意义。参考SA环境下的SSI,研究目的是比较术前低白蛋白血症的总体预测准确性与SENIC/NNIS风险评分的预测准确性。方法:这是对已有剖腹手术患者登记的亚分析(N = 439)。作为登记的一部分收集的变量包括术前血清白蛋白测量和SENIC/NNIS风险评分的所有参数。术前低白蛋白血症定义为术前血清白蛋白< 30 g/L。研究结果为术后30天的SSI。总体预测准确度通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定,结果以c统计量(95%置信区间[CI])表示。结果:术前低白蛋白血症、SENIC风险评分、NNIS风险评分的c -统计值分别为0.677 (CI: 0.609 ~ 0.746)、0.652 (CI: 0.582 ~ 0.721)、0.634 (CI: 0.563 ~ 0.705)。结论:三种方法对SSI的预测准确度相近。然而,术前低白蛋白血症比SENIC/NNIS评分有几个实际的优势,这是必须考虑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信