Challenges and Opportunities in the Design of Digital Distributed Affinity Diagramming Tools

Christian Remy, G. Harboe, J. Frich, M. M. Biskjaer, P. Dalsgaard
{"title":"Challenges and Opportunities in the Design of Digital Distributed Affinity Diagramming Tools","authors":"Christian Remy, G. Harboe, J. Frich, M. M. Biskjaer, P. Dalsgaard","doi":"10.1145/3452853.3452871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Affinity diagramming is an oft-used sense-making technique in design research and practice to analyze qualitative data, utilizing a large number of sticky notes on walls. Over the past two decades, several digital tools have been tried and tested to augment or even replace the physical affinity diagramming process. Even so, the analog process usually prevails. We developed an online collaboration tool specifically tailored toward affinity diagramming to explore the challenges and opportunities of such a system in the particular case where the distributed teams do not have access to co-located settings. Here, we present a user experience study of five groups (dyads) of students based on a one-hour diagramming task under remote observation, followed by semi-structured interviews. Our study contributes three distinct insights to inform future work, namely that digital affinity diagrams 1) reduce the awareness of co-participants’ actions, 2) provide fewer cues about ownership and use than physical diagrams, and 3) save time, improve manipulation, and overview. We end with a discussion of the challenges and opportunities for the design of digital tools for distributed teams involved in sense-making tasks.","PeriodicalId":334884,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 32nd European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 32nd European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3452853.3452871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Affinity diagramming is an oft-used sense-making technique in design research and practice to analyze qualitative data, utilizing a large number of sticky notes on walls. Over the past two decades, several digital tools have been tried and tested to augment or even replace the physical affinity diagramming process. Even so, the analog process usually prevails. We developed an online collaboration tool specifically tailored toward affinity diagramming to explore the challenges and opportunities of such a system in the particular case where the distributed teams do not have access to co-located settings. Here, we present a user experience study of five groups (dyads) of students based on a one-hour diagramming task under remote observation, followed by semi-structured interviews. Our study contributes three distinct insights to inform future work, namely that digital affinity diagrams 1) reduce the awareness of co-participants’ actions, 2) provide fewer cues about ownership and use than physical diagrams, and 3) save time, improve manipulation, and overview. We end with a discussion of the challenges and opportunities for the design of digital tools for distributed teams involved in sense-making tasks.
数字分布式亲和图工具设计中的挑战与机遇
亲和图是设计研究和实践中经常使用的一种意义构建技术,用于分析定性数据,利用大量的贴在墙上的便利贴。在过去的二十年里,已经尝试和测试了几种数字工具来增强甚至取代物理亲和关系图过程。即便如此,模拟过程通常还是占上风。我们开发了一个在线协作工具,专门针对亲缘关系图进行定制,以在分布式团队无法访问共同定位设置的特定情况下探索这种系统的挑战和机遇。在此,我们对五组学生进行了一项用户体验研究,该研究基于远程观察下一小时的绘图任务,随后是半结构化访谈。我们的研究为未来的工作提供了三个不同的见解,即数字亲和图1)减少了对共同参与者行为的认识,2)提供了比物理图更少的关于所有权和使用的线索,以及3)节省时间,改进操作和概述。最后,我们讨论了为分布式团队设计数字工具所面临的挑战和机遇,这些团队参与了意义生成任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信