Empirical Strategies in Software Engineering Research: A Literature Survey

C. Guevara-Vega, B. Bernárdez, A. Durán, Antonio Quiña-Mera, Margarita Cruz, Antonio Ruiz-Cortés
{"title":"Empirical Strategies in Software Engineering Research: A Literature Survey","authors":"C. Guevara-Vega, B. Bernárdez, A. Durán, Antonio Quiña-Mera, Margarita Cruz, Antonio Ruiz-Cortés","doi":"10.1109/ICI2ST51859.2021.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The Software Engineering (SE) research continues to gain strength and interest for researchers considering the need to apply rigor and scientific validity to research results. Objective: Establishing an overview of the topic through a classification scheme of publications and structure the field of interest. Method: We conducted a Systematic Mapping Study, including articles published until 2019, that report at least one study of empirical strategies in SE. Results: 80 initial sets of studies were selected and analyzed, identifying: i) empirical strategy type used and ii) Software Engineering hypotheses types used. Also, 20 papers of the set of studies for mapping were selected and analyzed, identifying 17 empirical strategies and 11 main characteristics to address the empirical research inception in SE. Conclusions: We corroborate that the selection of an empirical strategy in Software Engineering research depends on the nature and scope of the research and on the resources that the researcher has at that moment, in addition to the degree of scientific and methodological knowledge that he has to carry out an empirical study. It is necessary to continue studying in-depth the behavior and nature of the empirical strategies in Software Engineering research that allows strengthening the scientific taxonomy in SE, besides walking towards the automation of the experimental process.","PeriodicalId":148844,"journal":{"name":"2021 Second International Conference on Information Systems and Software Technologies (ICI2ST)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Second International Conference on Information Systems and Software Technologies (ICI2ST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICI2ST51859.2021.00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Context: The Software Engineering (SE) research continues to gain strength and interest for researchers considering the need to apply rigor and scientific validity to research results. Objective: Establishing an overview of the topic through a classification scheme of publications and structure the field of interest. Method: We conducted a Systematic Mapping Study, including articles published until 2019, that report at least one study of empirical strategies in SE. Results: 80 initial sets of studies were selected and analyzed, identifying: i) empirical strategy type used and ii) Software Engineering hypotheses types used. Also, 20 papers of the set of studies for mapping were selected and analyzed, identifying 17 empirical strategies and 11 main characteristics to address the empirical research inception in SE. Conclusions: We corroborate that the selection of an empirical strategy in Software Engineering research depends on the nature and scope of the research and on the resources that the researcher has at that moment, in addition to the degree of scientific and methodological knowledge that he has to carry out an empirical study. It is necessary to continue studying in-depth the behavior and nature of the empirical strategies in Software Engineering research that allows strengthening the scientific taxonomy in SE, besides walking towards the automation of the experimental process.
软件工程研究中的实证策略:文献综述
背景:软件工程(SE)研究继续获得力量和兴趣,研究人员考虑到需要将严谨性和科学有效性应用于研究结果。目的:通过出版物的分类方案和结构感兴趣的领域建立主题的概述。方法:我们进行了一项系统映射研究,包括截至2019年发表的文章,这些文章至少报告了一项SE的实证策略研究。结果:选择并分析了80个初始研究集,确定了:i)使用的经验策略类型和ii)使用的软件工程假设类型。此外,本文还对20篇研究论文进行了选择和分析,确定了17个实证策略和11个主要特征,以解决实证研究在东南地区的起步问题。结论:我们证实,在软件工程研究中,实证策略的选择取决于研究的性质和范围,以及研究人员当时拥有的资源,以及他必须进行实证研究的科学和方法论知识的程度。有必要继续深入研究软件工程研究中经验策略的行为和性质,以加强SE的科学分类,并走向实验过程的自动化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信