The Significance of Computer Forensics in Electronic Documents as Evidence in Criminal Law

Aris Hardinanto, Barda Nawawi Arief, Joko Setiyono
{"title":"The Significance of Computer Forensics in Electronic Documents as Evidence in Criminal Law","authors":"Aris Hardinanto, Barda Nawawi Arief, Joko Setiyono","doi":"10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forensic science standards, no crime never leaves traces. Along with the emergence of cybercrime, a new type of evidence emerged as an expansion of conventional evidence in Indonesian criminal procedural law, namely electronic evidence as stated in the Law on Electronic Information or electronic documents whose authenticity can be guaranteed, but there is no further explanation. Further, what is the procedure for guaranteeing its authenticity? Based on this, not all electronic information or documents can be used as evidence. One branch of forensic science that is relevant to proving cybercrimes is computer forensics. The problem that arises is to what extent is the significance of computer forensics to guarantee electronic information or electronic documents as evidence. This article was based on legal research using a conceptual, statutory, and case approach. The result of this study is that computer forensics plays a significant role in the crime of illegal access to electronic devices because it is a tool in criminal procedural law that can be used to guarantee the authenticity of electronic information or electronic documents so that they can be accepted as evidence in court.How to cite item: Hardinanto, Aris, Barda Nawawi Arief, and Joko Setiyono. “The Significance of Computer Forensics in Electronic Documents as Evidence in Criminal Law.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 14 no. 2 (2023):155-166. DOI: doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10820.","PeriodicalId":207438,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forensic science standards, no crime never leaves traces. Along with the emergence of cybercrime, a new type of evidence emerged as an expansion of conventional evidence in Indonesian criminal procedural law, namely electronic evidence as stated in the Law on Electronic Information or electronic documents whose authenticity can be guaranteed, but there is no further explanation. Further, what is the procedure for guaranteeing its authenticity? Based on this, not all electronic information or documents can be used as evidence. One branch of forensic science that is relevant to proving cybercrimes is computer forensics. The problem that arises is to what extent is the significance of computer forensics to guarantee electronic information or electronic documents as evidence. This article was based on legal research using a conceptual, statutory, and case approach. The result of this study is that computer forensics plays a significant role in the crime of illegal access to electronic devices because it is a tool in criminal procedural law that can be used to guarantee the authenticity of electronic information or electronic documents so that they can be accepted as evidence in court.How to cite item: Hardinanto, Aris, Barda Nawawi Arief, and Joko Setiyono. “The Significance of Computer Forensics in Electronic Documents as Evidence in Criminal Law.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 14 no. 2 (2023):155-166. DOI: doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10820.
电子文书作为刑事证据的计算机取证意义
按照法医学的标准,没有犯罪不会留下痕迹。随着网络犯罪的出现,作为传统证据的扩展,印尼刑事诉讼法中出现了一种新的证据类型,即《电子信息法》规定的电子证据或真实性可以保证但没有进一步解释的电子文件。其次,保证其真实性的程序是什么?基于此,并非所有的电子信息或文件都可以作为证据。与证明网络犯罪相关的法医科学的一个分支是计算机取证。由此产生的问题是计算机取证在多大程度上保证电子信息或电子文件作为证据的意义。这篇文章是基于法律研究,使用概念,法定和案例的方法。本研究的结果是,计算机取证在非法获取电子设备犯罪中起着重要的作用,因为它是刑事诉讼法中的一种工具,可以用来保证电子信息或电子文件的真实性,从而使其在法庭上被接受为证据。如何引用项目:哈迪南托,阿里斯,巴尔达·纳瓦维·阿里耶夫,佐科·塞提约诺。电子文件作为证据的计算机取证在刑法中的意义学报,第14期。2(2023): 155 - 166。DOI: doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10820。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信