Perceptions of superiors’ reputations and subordinates’ honesty moderates effect of budget participation on budgetary slack

Putu Ayu Putri Ginanti, A. Widanaputra
{"title":"Perceptions of superiors’ reputations and subordinates’ honesty moderates effect of budget participation on budgetary slack","authors":"Putu Ayu Putri Ginanti, A. Widanaputra","doi":"10.21744/ijbem.v5n3.1936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to provide empirical evidence regarding perceptions of superior reputation and subordinate honesty in weakening the effect of budgetary participation on budgetary slack. The data in this study were collected using a questionnaire. The population in this study is the Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah of Tabanan Regency with a sample of Echelon III and Echelon IV officials involved in budgeting. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling and obtained a sample of 199 respondents. The analysis technique in this study is Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) using SPSS version 25 program. The results of the regression analysis state that the perception of superior reputation weakens the relationship between budgetary participation and budgetary slack. This means that the higher the level of perception of subordinates on the reputation of their superiors, the tendency for budgetary slack to occur will be lower. The results of the regression analysis also state that the honesty of subordinates weakens the relationship between budgetary participation and budgetary slack. This means that the higher the level of honesty of subordinates, the tendency for budgetary slack to occur will be lower. ","PeriodicalId":359464,"journal":{"name":"International journal of business, economics & management","volume":"254 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of business, economics & management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21744/ijbem.v5n3.1936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to provide empirical evidence regarding perceptions of superior reputation and subordinate honesty in weakening the effect of budgetary participation on budgetary slack. The data in this study were collected using a questionnaire. The population in this study is the Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah of Tabanan Regency with a sample of Echelon III and Echelon IV officials involved in budgeting. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling and obtained a sample of 199 respondents. The analysis technique in this study is Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) using SPSS version 25 program. The results of the regression analysis state that the perception of superior reputation weakens the relationship between budgetary participation and budgetary slack. This means that the higher the level of perception of subordinates on the reputation of their superiors, the tendency for budgetary slack to occur will be lower. The results of the regression analysis also state that the honesty of subordinates weakens the relationship between budgetary participation and budgetary slack. This means that the higher the level of honesty of subordinates, the tendency for budgetary slack to occur will be lower. 
对上级声誉和下属诚实度的感知调节了预算参与对预算松弛的影响
本研究旨在提供经验证据,证明上级声誉知觉和下属诚实知觉在削弱预算参与对预算松弛的影响。本研究采用问卷调查的方式收集数据。本研究的人口是Tabanan摄政的Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah,样本是参与预算的三级和四级官员。采用的抽样技术是有目的抽样,获得199名受访者的样本。本研究的分析技术是使用SPSS 25版程序的缓和回归分析(MRA)。回归分析结果表明,优秀声誉的感知削弱了预算参与与预算松弛之间的关系。这意味着,下属对上级声誉的感知水平越高,预算松弛发生的趋势就越低。回归分析结果还表明,下属的诚实程度削弱了预算参与与预算松弛之间的关系。这意味着下属的诚实程度越高,预算松弛的趋势就越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信