Answering Ambiguous Questions via Iterative Prompting

Weiwei Sun, Hengyi Cai, Hongshen Chen, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Maarten de Rijke, Z. Ren
{"title":"Answering Ambiguous Questions via Iterative Prompting","authors":"Weiwei Sun, Hengyi Cai, Hongshen Chen, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Maarten de Rijke, Z. Ren","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2307.03897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In open-domain question answering, due to the ambiguity of questions, multiple plausible answers may exist.To provide feasible answers to an ambiguous question,one approach is to directly predict all valid answers, but this can struggle with balancing relevance and diversity.An alternative is to gather candidate answers and aggregate them, but this method can be computationally costly and may neglect dependencies among answers.In this paper, we present AmbigPrompt to address the imperfections of existing approaches to answering ambiguous questions.Specifically, we integrate an answering model with a prompting model in an iterative manner.The prompting model adaptively tracks the reading process and progressively triggers the answering model to compose distinct and relevant answers. Additionally, we develop a task-specific post-pretraining approach for both the answering model and the prompting model, which greatly improves the performance of our framework. Empirical studies on two commonly-used open benchmarks show that AmbigPrompt achieves state-of-the-art or competitive results while using less memory and having a lower inference latency than competing approaches. Additionally, AmbigPrompt also performs well in low-resource settings.","PeriodicalId":352845,"journal":{"name":"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.03897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In open-domain question answering, due to the ambiguity of questions, multiple plausible answers may exist.To provide feasible answers to an ambiguous question,one approach is to directly predict all valid answers, but this can struggle with balancing relevance and diversity.An alternative is to gather candidate answers and aggregate them, but this method can be computationally costly and may neglect dependencies among answers.In this paper, we present AmbigPrompt to address the imperfections of existing approaches to answering ambiguous questions.Specifically, we integrate an answering model with a prompting model in an iterative manner.The prompting model adaptively tracks the reading process and progressively triggers the answering model to compose distinct and relevant answers. Additionally, we develop a task-specific post-pretraining approach for both the answering model and the prompting model, which greatly improves the performance of our framework. Empirical studies on two commonly-used open benchmarks show that AmbigPrompt achieves state-of-the-art or competitive results while using less memory and having a lower inference latency than competing approaches. Additionally, AmbigPrompt also performs well in low-resource settings.
通过迭代提示回答模棱两可的问题
在开放域问答中,由于问题的模糊性,可能存在多个似是而非的答案。要为一个模棱两可的问题提供可行的答案,一种方法是直接预测所有有效的答案,但这可能会在平衡相关性和多样性方面遇到困难。另一种方法是收集候选答案并将它们聚合起来,但是这种方法可能在计算上代价高昂,并且可能忽略答案之间的依赖关系。在本文中,我们提出了歧义提示,以解决现有方法来回答歧义问题的不完善之处。具体来说,我们以迭代的方式将回答模型与提示模型集成在一起。提示模型自适应地跟踪阅读过程,并逐步触发回答模型,形成清晰而相关的答案。此外,我们为回答模型和提示模型开发了一种任务特定的后预训练方法,这大大提高了我们框架的性能。对两种常用的开放基准测试的实证研究表明,与竞争方法相比,使用更少的内存和更低的推理延迟,AmbigPrompt获得了最先进的或具有竞争力的结果。此外,在低资源设置中,AmbigPrompt也表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信