The Effect of Group Counseling based on Communication Skills on the Quality of Life of Pregnant Women

Tayebe Ziaei, Somayeh Gholipour, A. Danesh
{"title":"The Effect of Group Counseling based on Communication Skills on the Quality of Life of Pregnant Women","authors":"Tayebe Ziaei, Somayeh Gholipour, A. Danesh","doi":"10.52547/jgbfnm.18.1.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Women experience psychological problems during pregnancy affecting their quality of life. Since weakness in life skills, including communication skills (CS), is a factor of reducing the quality of life, we conducted a study to determine the effect of group counseling based on communication skills on the quality of life in pregnant women in Gorgan. Methods: The parallel randomized field study trial carried out in 2016 on 72 pregnant women who referred to the health centers in Gorgan, Iran. The pregnant women at the gestational age of 14-18 weeks were recruited in convenience sampling method, and then randomly assigned in to the intervention and control groups using the block randomization method. The data collection tool included the quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) that was completed by both groups before the intervention. The samples of the intervention group received 6 sessions of group counseling based on communication skills for a one-hour session per week. A week after the sessions, the questionnaires were completed again by both groups. We analyzed the data in SPSS-16 using the independent t-test, Mann-Whitney test, Wilcoxon test, Paired t-test, and Chi-square test. Results: The mean of women's age was 28.4±4.3 years in the intervention group, and was 26.8±4.5 years in the control group, and the mean age of their husbands were 33.14±5.3 and 31.22± 4.8 in the intervention and control groups, respectively. There was statistically significant difference between the intervention (60±15.2) and control (49±13.4) groups after the intervention in total quality of life (P=0.002). The results indicated that the mean scores of quality of life of women in the intervention group versus the control group after the intervention had statistically significant differences in all areas except for the \"physical function\" (65.3±17.4 vs. 61.5±20.1, P=0.4) and \"role limitation due to physical problems\" (50±36.8 vs. 45.1±27.3, P=0.56). Conclusion: The health centers need to be taught about the communication skills in line with physical training during pregnancy by midwives and midwifery counselors.","PeriodicalId":314765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/jgbfnm.18.1.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women experience psychological problems during pregnancy affecting their quality of life. Since weakness in life skills, including communication skills (CS), is a factor of reducing the quality of life, we conducted a study to determine the effect of group counseling based on communication skills on the quality of life in pregnant women in Gorgan. Methods: The parallel randomized field study trial carried out in 2016 on 72 pregnant women who referred to the health centers in Gorgan, Iran. The pregnant women at the gestational age of 14-18 weeks were recruited in convenience sampling method, and then randomly assigned in to the intervention and control groups using the block randomization method. The data collection tool included the quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) that was completed by both groups before the intervention. The samples of the intervention group received 6 sessions of group counseling based on communication skills for a one-hour session per week. A week after the sessions, the questionnaires were completed again by both groups. We analyzed the data in SPSS-16 using the independent t-test, Mann-Whitney test, Wilcoxon test, Paired t-test, and Chi-square test. Results: The mean of women's age was 28.4±4.3 years in the intervention group, and was 26.8±4.5 years in the control group, and the mean age of their husbands were 33.14±5.3 and 31.22± 4.8 in the intervention and control groups, respectively. There was statistically significant difference between the intervention (60±15.2) and control (49±13.4) groups after the intervention in total quality of life (P=0.002). The results indicated that the mean scores of quality of life of women in the intervention group versus the control group after the intervention had statistically significant differences in all areas except for the "physical function" (65.3±17.4 vs. 61.5±20.1, P=0.4) and "role limitation due to physical problems" (50±36.8 vs. 45.1±27.3, P=0.56). Conclusion: The health centers need to be taught about the communication skills in line with physical training during pregnancy by midwives and midwifery counselors.
基于沟通技巧的团体咨询对孕妇生活质量的影响
背景:女性在怀孕期间会出现心理问题,影响她们的生活质量。由于生活技能(包括沟通技能)的薄弱是降低生活质量的一个因素,我们进行了一项研究,以确定基于沟通技能的团体咨询对戈尔根孕妇生活质量的影响。方法:对2016年在伊朗戈尔根卫生中心就诊的72名孕妇进行平行随机实地研究试验。采用方便抽样法招募14 ~ 18周孕龄的孕妇,采用分组随机法随机分为干预组和对照组。数据收集工具包括两组在干预前完成的生活质量问卷(SF-36)。干预组的样本接受了6次基于沟通技巧的小组咨询,每周1小时。疗程一周后,两组人员再次完成问卷调查。我们采用独立t检验、Mann-Whitney检验、Wilcoxon检验、配对t检验和卡方检验对SPSS-16中的数据进行分析。结果:干预组妇女平均年龄为28.4±4.3岁,对照组妇女平均年龄为26.8±4.5岁,干预组和对照组妇女丈夫平均年龄分别为33.14±5.3岁和31.22±4.8岁。干预组总生活质量(60±15.2)与对照组(49±13.4)比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。结果显示,干预组妇女在干预后的生活质量平均得分与对照组相比,除“身体功能”(65.3±17.4比61.5±20.1,P=0.4)和“身体问题导致的角色限制”(50±36.8比45.1±27.3,P=0.56)外,其余各方面均有统计学差异。结论:助产士和助产辅导员需要对保健中心进行与孕期体能训练相一致的沟通技巧教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信