Cleaning Data with Constraints and Experts

A. Assadi, T. Milo, Slava Novgorodov
{"title":"Cleaning Data with Constraints and Experts","authors":"A. Assadi, T. Milo, Slava Novgorodov","doi":"10.1145/3201463.3201464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Popular techniques for data cleaning use integrity constraints to identify errors in the data and to automatically resolve them, e.g. by using predefined priorities among possible updates and finding a minimal repair that will resolve violations. Such automatic solutions however cannot ensure precision of the repairs since they do not have enough evidence about the actual errors and may in fact lead to wrong results with respect to the ground truth. It has thus been suggested to use domain experts to examine the potential updates and choose which should be applied to the database. However, the sheer volume of the databases and the large number of possible updates that may resolve a given constraint violation, may make such a manual examination prohibitory expensive. The goal of the DANCE system presented here is to help to optimize the experts work and reduce as much as possible the number of questions (updates verification) they need to address. Given a constraint violation, our algorithm identifies the suspicious tuples whose update may contribute (directly or indirectly) to the constraint resolution, as well as the possible dependencies among them. Using this information it builds a graph whose nodes are the suspicious tuples and whose weighted edges capture the likelihood of an error in one tuple to occur and affect the other. PageRank-style algorithm then allows us to identify the most beneficial tuples to ask about first. Incremental graph maintenance is used to assure interactive response time. We implemented our solution in the DANCE system and show its effectiveness and efficiency through a comprehensive suite of experiments.","PeriodicalId":365496,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st International Workshop on the Web and Databases","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st International Workshop on the Web and Databases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3201463.3201464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Popular techniques for data cleaning use integrity constraints to identify errors in the data and to automatically resolve them, e.g. by using predefined priorities among possible updates and finding a minimal repair that will resolve violations. Such automatic solutions however cannot ensure precision of the repairs since they do not have enough evidence about the actual errors and may in fact lead to wrong results with respect to the ground truth. It has thus been suggested to use domain experts to examine the potential updates and choose which should be applied to the database. However, the sheer volume of the databases and the large number of possible updates that may resolve a given constraint violation, may make such a manual examination prohibitory expensive. The goal of the DANCE system presented here is to help to optimize the experts work and reduce as much as possible the number of questions (updates verification) they need to address. Given a constraint violation, our algorithm identifies the suspicious tuples whose update may contribute (directly or indirectly) to the constraint resolution, as well as the possible dependencies among them. Using this information it builds a graph whose nodes are the suspicious tuples and whose weighted edges capture the likelihood of an error in one tuple to occur and affect the other. PageRank-style algorithm then allows us to identify the most beneficial tuples to ask about first. Incremental graph maintenance is used to assure interactive response time. We implemented our solution in the DANCE system and show its effectiveness and efficiency through a comprehensive suite of experiments.
使用约束和专家清理数据
流行的数据清理技术使用完整性约束来识别数据中的错误并自动解决这些错误,例如,通过在可能的更新中使用预定义的优先级,并找到将解决违规的最小修复。然而,这种自动解决方案不能确保维修的精度,因为它们没有足够的证据证明实际错误,实际上可能导致与实际情况有关的错误结果。因此,建议使用领域专家来检查潜在的更新,并选择应该应用于数据库的更新。然而,数据库的绝对数量和可能解决给定约束违反的大量可能更新,可能使这种手动检查的成本高得令人望而却步。这里介绍的DANCE系统的目标是帮助优化专家的工作,并尽可能减少他们需要解决的问题(更新验证)的数量。给定一个违反约束的情况,我们的算法识别出其更新可能(直接或间接)有助于约束解析的可疑元组,以及它们之间可能的依赖关系。使用这些信息,它构建一个图,其节点是可疑的元组,其加权边捕获一个元组中发生错误并影响另一个元组的可能性。然后,pagerank样式的算法允许我们首先确定最有益的元组。增量图维护用于保证交互响应时间。我们在DANCE系统中实现了我们的解决方案,并通过一套全面的实验证明了它的有效性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信