The evaluation of GAENE 2.1 in Greek students

Miltiadis Manikas, Ioannis Leonardos, K. Plakitsi, K. Sotiropoulos
{"title":"The evaluation of GAENE 2.1 in Greek students","authors":"Miltiadis Manikas, Ioannis Leonardos, K. Plakitsi, K. Sotiropoulos","doi":"10.29333/mathsciteacher/13069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The acceptance of evolution by Greek students aged 17 has never been actually measured neither via a poll survey nor with the application of any of the existing psychometric tools that have been developed for this purpose. In this research, GAENE 2.1 was chosen because it is a one-dimensional tool that can only measure the acceptance of evolution and does not contain items related to the understanding of evolution and the respondent’s religious beliefs. The assessment of the appropriateness of the tool for our sample was tested with the criteria of Rasch model. Despite the fact that some of GAENE 2.1 items may not show the expected statistical fit and probably overestimates the levels of acceptance of evolution, the tool is appropriated to measure with efficiently and effectively way the acceptance of evolution in the specific sample.","PeriodicalId":343598,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The acceptance of evolution by Greek students aged 17 has never been actually measured neither via a poll survey nor with the application of any of the existing psychometric tools that have been developed for this purpose. In this research, GAENE 2.1 was chosen because it is a one-dimensional tool that can only measure the acceptance of evolution and does not contain items related to the understanding of evolution and the respondent’s religious beliefs. The assessment of the appropriateness of the tool for our sample was tested with the criteria of Rasch model. Despite the fact that some of GAENE 2.1 items may not show the expected statistical fit and probably overestimates the levels of acceptance of evolution, the tool is appropriated to measure with efficiently and effectively way the acceptance of evolution in the specific sample.
希腊学生GAENE 2.1的评价
17岁的希腊学生对进化论的接受程度从未通过民意调查或任何现有的为此目的而开发的心理测量工具的应用进行过实际测量。在本研究中,选择GAENE 2.1是因为它是一个一维的工具,只能衡量对进化论的接受程度,不包含与对进化论的理解和被调查者的宗教信仰相关的项目。评估工具的适当性为我们的样本进行了测试与拉赫模型的标准。尽管GAENE 2.1的一些项目可能没有显示出预期的统计拟合,并且可能高估了进化的接受程度,但该工具适用于以有效和有效的方式测量特定样本中的进化接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信