The Ruins of Allegory: Paradise Lost and the Metamorphosis of Epic Convention

J. Powers-Beck, Catherine Martin
{"title":"The Ruins of Allegory: Paradise Lost and the Metamorphosis of Epic Convention","authors":"J. Powers-Beck, Catherine Martin","doi":"10.2307/3201555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this reexamination of the allegorical dimensions of Paradise Lost, Catherine Martin presents Milton's poem as a prophecy foretelling the end of one culture and its replacement by another. She argues that rather than merely extending the allegorical tradition as defined by Augustine, Dante, and Spenser, Milton has written a meta-allegory that stages a confrontation with an allegorical formalism that is either dead or no longer philosophically viable. By both critiquing and recasting the traditional form, Milton describes the transition to a new epoch that promises the possibility of human redemption in history. Martin shows how Paradise Lost, written at the threshold of the enormous imaginative shift that accompanied the Protestant, scientific, and political revolutions of the seventeenth century, conforms to a prophetic baroque model of allegory similar to that outlined by Walter Benjamin. As she demonstrates, Milton's experimentation with baroque forms radically reformulates classical epic, medieval romance, and Spenserian allegory to allow for both a naturalistic, empirically responsible understanding of the universe and for an infinite and incomprehensible God. In this way, the resulting poetic world of Paradise Lost is like Milton's God, an allegorical \"ruin\" in which the divine is preserved but at the price of a loss of certainty. Also, as Martin suggests, the poem affirmatively anticipates modernity by placing the chief hope of human progress in the fully self-authored subject. Maintaining a dialogue with a critical tradition that extends from Johnson and Coleridge to the best contemporary Milton scholarship, Martin sets Paradise Lost in both the early modern and the postmodern worlds. Ruins of Allegory will greatly interest all Milton scholars, as well as students of literary criticism and early modern studies.","PeriodicalId":424324,"journal":{"name":"South Atlantic Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Atlantic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3201555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

In this reexamination of the allegorical dimensions of Paradise Lost, Catherine Martin presents Milton's poem as a prophecy foretelling the end of one culture and its replacement by another. She argues that rather than merely extending the allegorical tradition as defined by Augustine, Dante, and Spenser, Milton has written a meta-allegory that stages a confrontation with an allegorical formalism that is either dead or no longer philosophically viable. By both critiquing and recasting the traditional form, Milton describes the transition to a new epoch that promises the possibility of human redemption in history. Martin shows how Paradise Lost, written at the threshold of the enormous imaginative shift that accompanied the Protestant, scientific, and political revolutions of the seventeenth century, conforms to a prophetic baroque model of allegory similar to that outlined by Walter Benjamin. As she demonstrates, Milton's experimentation with baroque forms radically reformulates classical epic, medieval romance, and Spenserian allegory to allow for both a naturalistic, empirically responsible understanding of the universe and for an infinite and incomprehensible God. In this way, the resulting poetic world of Paradise Lost is like Milton's God, an allegorical "ruin" in which the divine is preserved but at the price of a loss of certainty. Also, as Martin suggests, the poem affirmatively anticipates modernity by placing the chief hope of human progress in the fully self-authored subject. Maintaining a dialogue with a critical tradition that extends from Johnson and Coleridge to the best contemporary Milton scholarship, Martin sets Paradise Lost in both the early modern and the postmodern worlds. Ruins of Allegory will greatly interest all Milton scholars, as well as students of literary criticism and early modern studies.
寓言的废墟:失乐园与史诗惯例的变形
在对《失乐园》的寓意维度的重新审视中,凯瑟琳·马丁将弥尔顿的这首诗作为一个预言,预言了一种文化的终结,并被另一种文化所取代。她认为,弥尔顿不仅仅是延续了奥古斯丁、但丁和斯宾塞所定义的寓言传统,而是写了一个元寓言,与寓言形式主义进行了对抗,这种形式主义要么已经死亡,要么在哲学上不再可行。通过对传统形式的批判和重塑,弥尔顿描述了向一个新时代的过渡,这个新时代承诺了人类在历史上获得救赎的可能性。马丁展示了《失乐园》是如何在17世纪伴随着新教、科学和政治革命的巨大想象力转变的门槛上写成的,它符合一种类似于沃尔特·本雅明所概述的巴洛克式寓言的预言模式。正如她所展示的,弥尔顿对巴洛克形式的实验,从根本上重新定义了古典史诗,中世纪浪漫,和斯宾塞式的寓言,以一种自然主义的,经验主义的,对宇宙的负责任的理解,以及一个无限的,不可理解的上帝。这样一来,《失乐园》的诗意世界就像弥尔顿笔下的上帝,一个讽喻的“废墟”,在这个废墟中,神性得以保留,但代价是失去了确定性。同时,正如马丁所言,这首诗通过把人类进步的主要希望放在完全自主创作的主体上,肯定地预测了现代性。马丁与从约翰逊和柯勒律治到当代最好的弥尔顿学术的批评传统保持着对话,他将《失乐园》设定在早期现代和后现代世界中。所有研究弥尔顿的学者,以及文学批评和早期现代研究的学生,都会对《寓言的废墟》产生极大的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信