A Study on the Limitations and Challenges of Legal Acceptance of Cultured Meat

S. Jo, So-Young Lee
{"title":"A Study on the Limitations and Challenges of Legal Acceptance of Cultured Meat","authors":"S. Jo, So-Young Lee","doi":"10.22397/bml.2022.28.357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumers' food consumption structure changes from grain-centered to meat-centered depending on economic factors and socio-cultural factors. As an alternative to the rapidly growing demand for meat, interest in alternative meat is rapidly increasing, and in particular, interest in cultured meat that is similar to meat in terms of sensuality is emerging. \nThe cultured meat industry is expanding centered on research and development, and recently, commercialization and commercialization of cultured meat have begun in domestic and foreign companies. However, in the commercialization of cultured meat, there is little discussion about the scope and limits of legal acceptability, such as the uncertainty of scientific safety raised by the livestock industry and the ethical responsibility of consumers. Studies related to cultured meat are mainly limited to technical aspects, and studies examining the legal field are lacking. Therefore, in this study, we tried to find out how far cultured meat can be accommodated in the current legal system, that is, the scope, limitations and challenges of legal capacity. \nCultured meat is not a product through livestock breeding from the viewpoint of the production system, so there are limitations in receiving the application of the 「Livestock Industry Act」, 「Food Sanitation Act」, and 「Food Code」. cultured meat has no legal basis to apply standards and specifications in the 「Food Sanitation Act」 and 「Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act」 even in the safety system. Even in the labeling system, it cannot be labeled as “meat” because it is not a livestock product stipulated by the 「Livestock Industry Act」. Cultured meat does not have a clear legal basis not only in Korea but also in major developed countries. This is due to ethical and scientific limitations, as well as being in conflict with the livestock industry and livestock products based on existing livestock breeding. Priority should be given to preparing legal regulations that can secure the reliability of the livestock industry, agricultural, and consumers. It is judged that it will be after that that cultured meat can be recognized as a substitute food to the extent that the scope of livestock industry and agriculture is not reduced.","PeriodicalId":430360,"journal":{"name":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22397/bml.2022.28.357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumers' food consumption structure changes from grain-centered to meat-centered depending on economic factors and socio-cultural factors. As an alternative to the rapidly growing demand for meat, interest in alternative meat is rapidly increasing, and in particular, interest in cultured meat that is similar to meat in terms of sensuality is emerging. The cultured meat industry is expanding centered on research and development, and recently, commercialization and commercialization of cultured meat have begun in domestic and foreign companies. However, in the commercialization of cultured meat, there is little discussion about the scope and limits of legal acceptability, such as the uncertainty of scientific safety raised by the livestock industry and the ethical responsibility of consumers. Studies related to cultured meat are mainly limited to technical aspects, and studies examining the legal field are lacking. Therefore, in this study, we tried to find out how far cultured meat can be accommodated in the current legal system, that is, the scope, limitations and challenges of legal capacity. Cultured meat is not a product through livestock breeding from the viewpoint of the production system, so there are limitations in receiving the application of the 「Livestock Industry Act」, 「Food Sanitation Act」, and 「Food Code」. cultured meat has no legal basis to apply standards and specifications in the 「Food Sanitation Act」 and 「Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act」 even in the safety system. Even in the labeling system, it cannot be labeled as “meat” because it is not a livestock product stipulated by the 「Livestock Industry Act」. Cultured meat does not have a clear legal basis not only in Korea but also in major developed countries. This is due to ethical and scientific limitations, as well as being in conflict with the livestock industry and livestock products based on existing livestock breeding. Priority should be given to preparing legal regulations that can secure the reliability of the livestock industry, agricultural, and consumers. It is judged that it will be after that that cultured meat can be recognized as a substitute food to the extent that the scope of livestock industry and agriculture is not reduced.
培养肉法律接受的局限性与挑战研究
受经济因素和社会文化因素的影响,消费者的食品消费结构从以粮食为中心向以肉类为中心转变。作为对肉类需求快速增长的替代品,人们对替代肉类的兴趣正在迅速增加,特别是对与肉类在感官上相似的培养肉的兴趣正在兴起。以研究开发为中心的人造肉产业正在扩大,最近在国内外企业开始了人造肉的商用化和商业化。然而,在人造肉的商业化过程中,很少有关于法律可接受性的范围和限制的讨论,例如畜牧业提出的科学安全性的不确定性以及消费者的伦理责任。与培养肉相关的研究主要局限于技术方面,缺乏对法律领域的研究。因此,在本研究中,我们试图找出培养肉在现行法律体系中可以容纳到什么程度,即法律行为能力的范围、限制和挑战。从生产系统的角度来看,人造肉不是家畜养殖的产品,因此在接受《畜牧业法》、《食品卫生法》和《食品法典》的适用时存在局限性。即使在安全体系中,也没有法律依据适用《食品卫生法》和《畜产品卫生管理法》的标准和规范。即使在标签制度中,也不能标注为“肉”,因为它不是“畜牧业法”规定的畜产品。不仅在韩国,在主要发达国家也没有明确的法律依据。这是由于伦理和科学的限制,以及与畜牧业和基于现有牲畜育种的牲畜产品相冲突。应该优先制定能够确保畜牧业、农业和消费者的可靠性的法律规定。据此判断,在不缩小畜牧业和农业范围的情况下,今后可以将人造肉认定为替代食品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信