Fault tree analysis and binary decision diagrams

Roslyn M. Sinnamon, John Andrews
{"title":"Fault tree analysis and binary decision diagrams","authors":"Roslyn M. Sinnamon, John Andrews","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.1996.500665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fault tree analysis is now commonly used to assess the adequacy, in reliability terms, of industrial systems. For complex systems, an analysis may produce thousands of combinations of events which can cause system failure (minimal cut sets). The determination of these minimal cut sets can be a very time consuming process even on modern high speed digital computers. Also, if the fault tree has many minimal cut sets, calculating the exact top event probability will require extensive calculations. For many complex fault trees this requirement is beyond the capability of the available machines, thus approximation techniques need to be introduced resulting in loss of accuracy. This paper describes the use of a binary decision diagram for fault tree analysis and some ways in which it can be efficiently implemented on a computer. The work to date shows a substantial improvement in computational effort for large, complex fault trees analysed with this method in comparison to the traditional approach. The binary decision diagram method has the additional advantage that as approximations are not required, exact calculations for the top event parameters can be performed.","PeriodicalId":393833,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"65","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1996.500665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

Abstract

Fault tree analysis is now commonly used to assess the adequacy, in reliability terms, of industrial systems. For complex systems, an analysis may produce thousands of combinations of events which can cause system failure (minimal cut sets). The determination of these minimal cut sets can be a very time consuming process even on modern high speed digital computers. Also, if the fault tree has many minimal cut sets, calculating the exact top event probability will require extensive calculations. For many complex fault trees this requirement is beyond the capability of the available machines, thus approximation techniques need to be introduced resulting in loss of accuracy. This paper describes the use of a binary decision diagram for fault tree analysis and some ways in which it can be efficiently implemented on a computer. The work to date shows a substantial improvement in computational effort for large, complex fault trees analysed with this method in comparison to the traditional approach. The binary decision diagram method has the additional advantage that as approximations are not required, exact calculations for the top event parameters can be performed.
故障树分析和二元决策图
故障树分析现在通常用于评估工业系统在可靠性方面的充足性。对于复杂的系统,一次分析可能会产生数千个可能导致系统故障的事件组合(最小割集)。即使在现代高速数字计算机上,这些最小割集的确定也可能是一个非常耗时的过程。此外,如果故障树有许多最小割集,计算精确的顶部事件概率将需要大量的计算。对于许多复杂的故障树,这一要求超出了现有机器的能力,因此需要引入近似技术,导致精度下降。本文介绍了二叉决策图在故障树分析中的应用,以及在计算机上有效实现二叉决策图的几种方法。迄今为止的工作表明,与传统方法相比,使用该方法分析大型复杂故障树的计算量有了实质性的提高。二元决策图方法还有一个额外的优点,即由于不需要近似值,因此可以执行对顶级事件参数的精确计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信