FDA Should Re-evaluate All mRNA Vaccines and Revoke Their Use Authorizations (The Short Version).

Jianqing Wu
{"title":"FDA Should Re-evaluate All mRNA Vaccines and Revoke Their Use Authorizations (The Short Version).","authors":"Jianqing Wu","doi":"10.14302/issn.2692-1537.ijcv-21-4053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drug industry, controlling medical publishers and large media promote flawed medicine for their revenues by systematically laundering medical knowledge in decades. They maintain and promote flawed research models and suppress disruptive discoveries, thereby precluding reform of medicine. In this study, I will deeply explore how the wrong life model, population-based research model, misused clinical trials, flawed statistical models, the symptom based research methods, binary disease classification, failure to address the massive vital organ capacities, failure to correct biases caused by expected delay in realizing side effects, and failure to address the interference effects of non-controllable factors affect the conclusions of “effectiveness and safety” for mRNA vaccines. I will directly analyze three studies that have been relied upon by FDA in approving mNRA use authorizations: one BNT162b2 effectiveness study published in NEJM, one booster shot study published in NEJM and a Seven Integrated Health Care Organizations study published by CDC. I will expose fatal flaws in the frequency risk concept, effectiveness rate, and hazard reduction ratios, and show why 3% death rate, 95% effectiveness rate and 90% mortality reduction are all meaningless and misleading, and should never have been used as treatment guidance. I will also examine common biases that can be easily practiced by sponsors’ researchers to alter conclusions in favor of approval. By relying on laundered medical “knowledge”, FDA has consistently failed to predict latent drug side effects for any drugs and vaccines in its history. FDA approved disastrous DES in 1941, Swine Flu vaccine in 1976, and mRNA vaccines in 2020. The vaccines are used to deliver short-term benefits on a small percent of persons at the costs of damaging health, causing deaths that could be avoided, and shortening lifespans for all people in the population. I thus urge FDA to reevaluate all mRNA vaccines and revoke their use authorizations.","PeriodicalId":373064,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Coronaviruses","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Coronaviruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2692-1537.ijcv-21-4053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Drug industry, controlling medical publishers and large media promote flawed medicine for their revenues by systematically laundering medical knowledge in decades. They maintain and promote flawed research models and suppress disruptive discoveries, thereby precluding reform of medicine. In this study, I will deeply explore how the wrong life model, population-based research model, misused clinical trials, flawed statistical models, the symptom based research methods, binary disease classification, failure to address the massive vital organ capacities, failure to correct biases caused by expected delay in realizing side effects, and failure to address the interference effects of non-controllable factors affect the conclusions of “effectiveness and safety” for mRNA vaccines. I will directly analyze three studies that have been relied upon by FDA in approving mNRA use authorizations: one BNT162b2 effectiveness study published in NEJM, one booster shot study published in NEJM and a Seven Integrated Health Care Organizations study published by CDC. I will expose fatal flaws in the frequency risk concept, effectiveness rate, and hazard reduction ratios, and show why 3% death rate, 95% effectiveness rate and 90% mortality reduction are all meaningless and misleading, and should never have been used as treatment guidance. I will also examine common biases that can be easily practiced by sponsors’ researchers to alter conclusions in favor of approval. By relying on laundered medical “knowledge”, FDA has consistently failed to predict latent drug side effects for any drugs and vaccines in its history. FDA approved disastrous DES in 1941, Swine Flu vaccine in 1976, and mRNA vaccines in 2020. The vaccines are used to deliver short-term benefits on a small percent of persons at the costs of damaging health, causing deaths that could be avoided, and shortening lifespans for all people in the population. I thus urge FDA to reevaluate all mRNA vaccines and revoke their use authorizations.
FDA应重新评估所有mRNA疫苗并撤销其使用授权(简版)。
几十年来,制药业,控制医学出版商和大型媒体通过系统地清洗医学知识来推广有缺陷的医学,以获取收入。他们维护和促进有缺陷的研究模式,压制破坏性的发现,从而阻碍医学改革。在本研究中,我将深入探讨错误的生命模型、基于人群的研究模型、滥用的临床试验、有缺陷的统计模型、基于症状的研究方法、二元疾病分类、未能解决大量重要器官容量、未能纠正因预期延迟实现副作用而导致的偏差、未能解决非可控因素的干扰效应如何影响mRNA疫苗的“有效性和安全性”结论。我将直接分析FDA在批准mNRA使用授权时所依赖的三项研究:一项发表在NEJM上的BNT162b2有效性研究,一项发表在NEJM上的加强剂研究,以及一项由CDC发表的七家综合医疗机构研究。我将揭露频率风险概念、有效性和危害降低比的致命缺陷,并说明为什么3%的死亡率、95%的有效性和90%的死亡率降低都是毫无意义和误导性的,不应该被用作治疗指导。我还将检查常见的偏见,这些偏见很容易被赞助商的研究人员用来改变结论,以支持批准。由于依赖被洗白的医学“知识”,FDA在其历史上一直未能预测任何药物和疫苗的潜在药物副作用。FDA于1941年批准了灾难性的DES, 1976年批准了猪流感疫苗,2020年批准了mRNA疫苗。这些疫苗被用来为一小部分人提供短期好处,代价是损害健康,造成本可避免的死亡,并缩短人口中所有人的寿命。因此,我敦促FDA重新评估所有mRNA疫苗并撤销其使用授权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信