Separate features of the implementation of administrative procedures and administrative proceedings in accordance with the Administrative Procedure and Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan

A. Karipova, S. Serikbekova, А.Т. Toleubekov
{"title":"Separate features of the implementation of administrative procedures and administrative proceedings in accordance with the Administrative Procedure and Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan","authors":"A. Karipova, S. Serikbekova, А.Т. Toleubekov","doi":"10.31489/2023l1/26-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses certain features of administrative procedures and administrative proceedings when applying the norms of the Administrative Procedural and Procedural Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated June 29, 2020 No. 350-VI-ZRK (hereinafter referred to as APPK), which entered into force on July 1, 2021. The purpose of the article is to consider the features of administrative procedures, administrative proceedings and conciliation procedures in resolving public law disputes within the framework of the APC, as well as to analyze certain problematic issues of its application. The study used general scientific, private scientific legal methods of cognition. The authors reviewed and researched the distinctive principles of the implementation of administrative procedures and procedural features of administrative proceedings. With the introduction of the norms of the APC, the procedure for conducting both internal and external administrative procedures by state bodies has been streamlined, as well as administrative proceedings have been separated to resolve public law disputes involving an administrative (state) body or its official. The article touches upon the problems of passive, at the initial stage, application of conciliation procedures in resolving public law disputes by courts. On the example of the existing practice of bringing claims by state regulatory authorities to the court on the application of prohibitive and restrictive measures, it is proposed to transfer the consideration of this category of cases from the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the APC, since it follows from public law relations. There is also an unequal position of the parties to a public law dispute in terms of appeal and cassation appeal against judicial acts on disputes of a public law nature under the APC and the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan. At the same time, according to the authors, the introduction of the institute of administrative courts for the consideration of administrative cases and public law disputes should become an effective and efficient means of ensuring the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens and legal entities.","PeriodicalId":302577,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Karaganda University. “Law Series”","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Karaganda University. “Law Series”","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31489/2023l1/26-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses certain features of administrative procedures and administrative proceedings when applying the norms of the Administrative Procedural and Procedural Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated June 29, 2020 No. 350-VI-ZRK (hereinafter referred to as APPK), which entered into force on July 1, 2021. The purpose of the article is to consider the features of administrative procedures, administrative proceedings and conciliation procedures in resolving public law disputes within the framework of the APC, as well as to analyze certain problematic issues of its application. The study used general scientific, private scientific legal methods of cognition. The authors reviewed and researched the distinctive principles of the implementation of administrative procedures and procedural features of administrative proceedings. With the introduction of the norms of the APC, the procedure for conducting both internal and external administrative procedures by state bodies has been streamlined, as well as administrative proceedings have been separated to resolve public law disputes involving an administrative (state) body or its official. The article touches upon the problems of passive, at the initial stage, application of conciliation procedures in resolving public law disputes by courts. On the example of the existing practice of bringing claims by state regulatory authorities to the court on the application of prohibitive and restrictive measures, it is proposed to transfer the consideration of this category of cases from the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the APC, since it follows from public law relations. There is also an unequal position of the parties to a public law dispute in terms of appeal and cassation appeal against judicial acts on disputes of a public law nature under the APC and the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan. At the same time, according to the authors, the introduction of the institute of administrative courts for the consideration of administrative cases and public law disputes should become an effective and efficient means of ensuring the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens and legal entities.
根据《哈萨克斯坦共和国行政程序和程序法典》实施行政程序和行政诉讼的不同特点
本文讨论了适用于2021年7月1日生效的2020年6月29日第350-VI-ZRK号《哈萨克斯坦共和国行政程序和程序法典》(以下简称APPK)规范的行政程序和行政诉讼的某些特征。本文的目的是考虑行政程序、行政诉讼和调解程序在APC框架下解决公法纠纷的特点,并分析其适用中的一些问题。本研究采用一般科学、私人科学的法律认知方法。笔者回顾和研究了行政程序实施的独特原则和行政诉讼的程序特征。随着《行政协调委员会》规范的采用,国家机构进行内部和外部行政程序的程序已得到精简,行政程序也已分开,以解决涉及行政(国家)机构或其官员的公法争端。本文论述了法院在解决公法纠纷中被动适用调解程序的初步问题。以国家管制当局就适用禁止性和限制性措施向法院提出索赔的现有做法为例,建议将这类案件的审议从《哈萨克斯坦共和国民事诉讼法》转移到APC,因为它遵循公法关系。公法争端的当事方在根据《行政诉讼法》和《哈萨克斯坦共和国民事诉讼法》对公法性质争端的司法行为提出上诉和撤销上诉方面也处于不平等的地位。同时,作者认为,设立行政法院审理行政案件和公法纠纷,应成为确保保护公民和法人的合法权益的有效手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信