Sort-merge-join: an idea whose time has(h) passed?

G. Graefe
{"title":"Sort-merge-join: an idea whose time has(h) passed?","authors":"G. Graefe","doi":"10.1109/ICDE.1994.283062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Matching two sets of data items is a fundamental operation required in relational, extensible, and object-oriented database systems alike. However, the pros and cons of sort- and hash-based query evaluation techniques in modern query processing systems are still not fully understood. After our earlier research clarified strengths and weaknesses of sort- and hash-based query processing techniques and suggested remedies for the shortcomings of hash-based algorithms, the present paper outlines a number of further differences between sort-merge-join and hybrid hash join that traditionally have been ignored in such comparisons and render sort-merge-join mostly obsolete. We consolidate old and raise new issues pertinent to the comparison of sort- and hash-based query evaluation techniques and stir some thought and discussion among both academic and industrial database system builders.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":142465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Engineering","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.1994.283062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

Matching two sets of data items is a fundamental operation required in relational, extensible, and object-oriented database systems alike. However, the pros and cons of sort- and hash-based query evaluation techniques in modern query processing systems are still not fully understood. After our earlier research clarified strengths and weaknesses of sort- and hash-based query processing techniques and suggested remedies for the shortcomings of hash-based algorithms, the present paper outlines a number of further differences between sort-merge-join and hybrid hash join that traditionally have been ignored in such comparisons and render sort-merge-join mostly obsolete. We consolidate old and raise new issues pertinent to the comparison of sort- and hash-based query evaluation techniques and stir some thought and discussion among both academic and industrial database system builders.<>
排序-合并-连接:一个过时的想法?
匹配两组数据项是关系数据库、可扩展数据库和面向对象数据库系统都需要的基本操作。然而,在现代查询处理系统中,基于排序和基于散列的查询求值技术的优缺点仍然没有被完全理解。在我们早期的研究阐明了基于排序和基于散列的查询处理技术的优缺点,并提出了针对基于散列算法缺点的补救措施之后,本文概述了排序-合并-连接和混合散列连接之间的许多进一步的差异,这些差异传统上在这种比较中被忽略,并使排序-合并-连接几乎过时。我们对基于排序和基于哈希的查询评估技术的比较进行了总结,并提出了一些新的问题,引起了学术界和工业界数据库系统构建者的一些思考和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信