A Comparative Study Of Co-Occurrence Strategies for Building A Cross-Domain Sentiment Thesaurus

Tareq Al-Moslmi, M. Albared, Adel Al-Shabi, S. Abdullah, N. Omar
{"title":"A Comparative Study Of Co-Occurrence Strategies for Building A Cross-Domain Sentiment Thesaurus","authors":"Tareq Al-Moslmi, M. Albared, Adel Al-Shabi, S. Abdullah, N. Omar","doi":"10.1109/ICOICE48418.2019.9035179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the evolution of user-based web content, people naturally and freely share their opinion in numerous domains. However, this would result in a massive cost to label training data for many domains and prevent us from taking advantage of the shared information across-domains. As a result, cross-domain sentiment analysis is a challenging NLP task due to feature and polarity divergence. To build a sentiment sensitive thesaurus that to group different features that express the same sentiments for cross-domain sentiment classification, different co-occurrence measures are used. This paper presents a comparative study covering different co-occurrence methods for building a cross-domain sentiment thesaurus. This work also defines a Bidirectional Conditional Probability (BCP) to handle the unsymmetrical co-occurrence problem. Two machine learning classifiers (Naïve Bayes (NB) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)) and three feature selection methods (Information gain, Odd ratio, Chi-square) are used to evaluate the proposed model. Experimental results show that BCP results outperform four baseline co-occurrence calculation methods (PMI, PMI-square, EMI, and G-means) in the task of cross-domain sentiment analysis.","PeriodicalId":109414,"journal":{"name":"2019 First International Conference of Intelligent Computing and Engineering (ICOICE)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 First International Conference of Intelligent Computing and Engineering (ICOICE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOICE48418.2019.9035179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the evolution of user-based web content, people naturally and freely share their opinion in numerous domains. However, this would result in a massive cost to label training data for many domains and prevent us from taking advantage of the shared information across-domains. As a result, cross-domain sentiment analysis is a challenging NLP task due to feature and polarity divergence. To build a sentiment sensitive thesaurus that to group different features that express the same sentiments for cross-domain sentiment classification, different co-occurrence measures are used. This paper presents a comparative study covering different co-occurrence methods for building a cross-domain sentiment thesaurus. This work also defines a Bidirectional Conditional Probability (BCP) to handle the unsymmetrical co-occurrence problem. Two machine learning classifiers (Naïve Bayes (NB) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)) and three feature selection methods (Information gain, Odd ratio, Chi-square) are used to evaluate the proposed model. Experimental results show that BCP results outperform four baseline co-occurrence calculation methods (PMI, PMI-square, EMI, and G-means) in the task of cross-domain sentiment analysis.
构建跨领域情感词库的共现策略比较研究
随着基于用户的网络内容的发展,人们自然而自由地在许多领域分享他们的观点。然而,这将导致为许多领域标记训练数据的巨大成本,并阻止我们利用跨领域的共享信息。因此,由于特征和极性分歧,跨域情感分析是一项具有挑战性的NLP任务。为了构建情感敏感的词库,将表达相同情感的不同特征分组进行跨域情感分类,使用了不同的共现度量。本文对构建跨领域情感词库的不同共现方法进行了比较研究。本文还定义了一个双向条件概率(BCP)来处理非对称共现问题。使用两种机器学习分类器(Naïve贝叶斯(NB)和支持向量机(SVM))和三种特征选择方法(信息增益,奇数比,卡方)来评估所提出的模型。实验结果表明,在跨域情感分析任务中,BCP结果优于四种基线共现计算方法(PMI、PMI平方、EMI和G-means)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信