DNSSEC: Interoperability Challenges and Transition Mechanisms

A. Herzberg, Haya Schulmann
{"title":"DNSSEC: Interoperability Challenges and Transition Mechanisms","authors":"A. Herzberg, Haya Schulmann","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2013.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent cache poisoning attacks motivate protecting DNS with strong cryptography, by adopting DNSSEC, rather than with challenge-response 'defenses'. We discuss the state of DNSSEC deployment and obstacles to adoption. We then present an overview of challenges and potential pitfalls of DNSSEC, including: Incremental Deployment: we review deployment status of DNSSEC, and discuss potential for increased vulnerability due to popular practices of incremental deployment, and provide recommendations. Long DNSSEC Responses; Long DNS responses are vulnerable to attacks, we review cache poisoning attack on fragmented DNS responses, and discuss mitigations; Trust Model of DNS: we review the trust model of DNS and show that it may not be aligned with the security model of DNSSEC. We discuss using trust anchor repositories (TARs) to mitigate the trust problem. TARs were proposed to allow transition to DNSSEC and to provide security for early adopters.","PeriodicalId":302747,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2013.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Recent cache poisoning attacks motivate protecting DNS with strong cryptography, by adopting DNSSEC, rather than with challenge-response 'defenses'. We discuss the state of DNSSEC deployment and obstacles to adoption. We then present an overview of challenges and potential pitfalls of DNSSEC, including: Incremental Deployment: we review deployment status of DNSSEC, and discuss potential for increased vulnerability due to popular practices of incremental deployment, and provide recommendations. Long DNSSEC Responses; Long DNS responses are vulnerable to attacks, we review cache poisoning attack on fragmented DNS responses, and discuss mitigations; Trust Model of DNS: we review the trust model of DNS and show that it may not be aligned with the security model of DNSSEC. We discuss using trust anchor repositories (TARs) to mitigate the trust problem. TARs were proposed to allow transition to DNSSEC and to provide security for early adopters.
DNSSEC:互操作性挑战和转换机制
最近的缓存中毒攻击促使采用DNSSEC,而不是挑战响应“防御”,使用强大的加密技术来保护DNS。我们讨论了DNSSEC部署的状态和采用的障碍。然后,我们概述了DNSSEC的挑战和潜在缺陷,包括:增量部署:我们回顾了DNSSEC的部署状态,并讨论了由于流行的增量部署实践而增加的脆弱性的可能性,并提出了建议。长DNSSEC响应;长DNS响应容易受到攻击,我们回顾了分片DNS响应的缓存中毒攻击,并讨论了缓解措施;DNS的信任模型:我们回顾了DNS的信任模型,并指出它可能与DNSSEC的安全模型不一致。我们将讨论使用信任锚库(TARs)来缓解信任问题。TARs被提议允许向DNSSEC过渡,并为早期采用者提供安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信