Establishing a GLP compliance program for non‐toxicology safety studies

Henry Li, Susan Hawlk, H. Renfrow, R. Hartwell, Shih‐Fong Chao, G. Sharp, C. Pilkington, S. Petteway, K. Remington, D. Pifat
{"title":"Establishing a GLP compliance program for non‐toxicology safety studies","authors":"Henry Li, Susan Hawlk, H. Renfrow, R. Hartwell, Shih‐Fong Chao, G. Sharp, C. Pilkington, S. Petteway, K. Remington, D. Pifat","doi":"10.1002/qaj.270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) were originally promulgated for regulating non‐clinical laboratory safety studies, specifically, toxicology studies. Since the introduction of GLPs, regulatory agencies worldwide have increasingly required additional types of safety studies, such as viral clearance studies for plasma‐derived and biotechnology products, to be performed in accordance with the principles of the GLP regulations. Establishment of a GLP compliance program for non‐toxicology safety studies, however, has many challenges. In a viral validation study, a bench‐scale model of a manufacturing step is developed and is used to evaluate virus clearance, and so, many GLP elements such as the definitions for test article and test system, are not directly applicable. In spite of these difficulties, GLP concepts can be implemented as much as possible to ensure the integrity of the study. A GLP compliance program, with application to a number of disciplines, including viral validation, was established at Bayer HealthCare Biological Products Division. Integral to the effort was a multi‐functional team comprised of members from the quality Assurance Unit (QAU) and different departments within Research and Development (R&D). The team is primarily responsible for preparing, reviewing, and harmonizing the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) used in all regulated non‐clinical laboratory studies. Through the effective interactions between R&D and QAU, study participants gain essential knowledge and experience in GLPs. In addition to performing audits, the QAU plays an important role in the implementation of strategies for GLP compliance. As a result, significant progress has been made toward meeting the challenges of establishing a GLP compliance program for non‐toxicology safety studies. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":313061,"journal":{"name":"The Quality Assurance Journal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Quality Assurance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qaj.270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) were originally promulgated for regulating non‐clinical laboratory safety studies, specifically, toxicology studies. Since the introduction of GLPs, regulatory agencies worldwide have increasingly required additional types of safety studies, such as viral clearance studies for plasma‐derived and biotechnology products, to be performed in accordance with the principles of the GLP regulations. Establishment of a GLP compliance program for non‐toxicology safety studies, however, has many challenges. In a viral validation study, a bench‐scale model of a manufacturing step is developed and is used to evaluate virus clearance, and so, many GLP elements such as the definitions for test article and test system, are not directly applicable. In spite of these difficulties, GLP concepts can be implemented as much as possible to ensure the integrity of the study. A GLP compliance program, with application to a number of disciplines, including viral validation, was established at Bayer HealthCare Biological Products Division. Integral to the effort was a multi‐functional team comprised of members from the quality Assurance Unit (QAU) and different departments within Research and Development (R&D). The team is primarily responsible for preparing, reviewing, and harmonizing the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) used in all regulated non‐clinical laboratory studies. Through the effective interactions between R&D and QAU, study participants gain essential knowledge and experience in GLPs. In addition to performing audits, the QAU plays an important role in the implementation of strategies for GLP compliance. As a result, significant progress has been made toward meeting the challenges of establishing a GLP compliance program for non‐toxicology safety studies. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
为非毒理学安全性研究建立GLP合规程序
良好实验室规范(GLP)最初是为了规范非临床实验室安全性研究,特别是毒理学研究而颁布的。自引入GLP以来,世界各地的监管机构越来越多地要求进行其他类型的安全性研究,如血浆源性和生物技术产品的病毒清除研究,以按照GLP法规的原则进行。然而,为非毒理学安全性研究建立GLP合规计划面临许多挑战。在病毒验证研究中,开发了一个制造步骤的实验规模模型,并用于评估病毒清除,因此,许多GLP元素,如测试品和测试系统的定义,并不直接适用。尽管有这些困难,GLP概念可以尽可能地实施,以确保研究的完整性。在拜耳医疗保健生物产品部建立了一个适用于许多学科(包括病毒验证)的GLP合规计划。一个由质量保证组(QAU)和研发部(R&D)不同部门成员组成的多功能团队是这项工作的组成部分。该团队主要负责准备、审查和协调所有受监管的非临床实验室研究中使用的标准操作程序(sop)。通过R&D和QAU之间的有效互动,研究参与者获得了glp的基本知识和经验。除了执行审计外,QAU还在实施GLP合规战略方面发挥着重要作用。因此,在为非毒理学安全性研究建立GLP合规计划的挑战方面取得了重大进展。版权所有©2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信