Framework for interpretable Bayesian soil moisture modelling

J. Simmons, V. Pino, A. Graaf, R. Vervoort
{"title":"Framework for interpretable Bayesian soil moisture modelling","authors":"J. Simmons, V. Pino, A. Graaf, R. Vervoort","doi":"10.36334/modsim.2023.simmons461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Soil moisture is a key driver of hydrological processes such as flooding during wet periods and vegetation growth in dry periods, but is highly variable in time and space. Soil moisture varies due to landcover, soil type, landscape position, and rainfall input. Disentangling the different drivers and spatial relationships in soil moisture are important to deliver forecasts. To facilitate this, the most widely-used approach to simulating soil moisture is numerical modelling. More recent approaches using neural networks display good predictive performance, but lose interpretability. In contrast, numerical models are often too rigid, and quantifying uncertainty can be difficult and computationally expensive. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate a Bayesian modelling framework that is flexible, quantifies uncertainties, disentangles the relative importance of different drivers, and is able to make forecasts. The data are derived from a dense soil moisture observation network at Llara farm in Narrabri (NSW), installed as part of a landscape rehydration project. This project consists of two 40 ha sites, each with control areas and treatment areas. The treatment involves the installation of contour banks with 1 m elevation to reduce over-land flow velocities and increase infiltration. Given their spatial distribution, each of the gauges has varying topological features and soil characteristics that may also influence the relationship of soil moisture to forcing variables (e.g., rainfall and evaptranspiration). For this modelling, we focused on 16 months of 10 minute interval data across 32 gauges at a common depth below the surface (200 mm). These data were aggregated to a daily mean to align with rainfall data from a nearby rain gauge at Llara farm and evapotranspiration data downloaded from SILO. The model is a Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM) fit using a Bayesian approach leveraging the No-U-Turn MCMC sampler implemented in NumPyro. HLMs are well suited to modelling nested data, such as in this case where gauges can be grouped by site and treatment, alongside gauge specific factors. Soil moisture at time t ( SM t ) is modelled at each gauge as a simple linear regression of the rainfall ( R ), evapotranspiration ( E ), and an autoregressive term (the soil moisture from the previous timestep, SM t − 1 ). The corresponding coefficients of the linear regression are β R , β E and β AR , respectively, along with an intercept term ( β 0 ). By introducing group level parameters via hierarchical priors on our β terms, we can explore the effects of site and treatment on the dynamics of soil moisture over time.","PeriodicalId":390064,"journal":{"name":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.simmons461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Soil moisture is a key driver of hydrological processes such as flooding during wet periods and vegetation growth in dry periods, but is highly variable in time and space. Soil moisture varies due to landcover, soil type, landscape position, and rainfall input. Disentangling the different drivers and spatial relationships in soil moisture are important to deliver forecasts. To facilitate this, the most widely-used approach to simulating soil moisture is numerical modelling. More recent approaches using neural networks display good predictive performance, but lose interpretability. In contrast, numerical models are often too rigid, and quantifying uncertainty can be difficult and computationally expensive. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate a Bayesian modelling framework that is flexible, quantifies uncertainties, disentangles the relative importance of different drivers, and is able to make forecasts. The data are derived from a dense soil moisture observation network at Llara farm in Narrabri (NSW), installed as part of a landscape rehydration project. This project consists of two 40 ha sites, each with control areas and treatment areas. The treatment involves the installation of contour banks with 1 m elevation to reduce over-land flow velocities and increase infiltration. Given their spatial distribution, each of the gauges has varying topological features and soil characteristics that may also influence the relationship of soil moisture to forcing variables (e.g., rainfall and evaptranspiration). For this modelling, we focused on 16 months of 10 minute interval data across 32 gauges at a common depth below the surface (200 mm). These data were aggregated to a daily mean to align with rainfall data from a nearby rain gauge at Llara farm and evapotranspiration data downloaded from SILO. The model is a Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM) fit using a Bayesian approach leveraging the No-U-Turn MCMC sampler implemented in NumPyro. HLMs are well suited to modelling nested data, such as in this case where gauges can be grouped by site and treatment, alongside gauge specific factors. Soil moisture at time t ( SM t ) is modelled at each gauge as a simple linear regression of the rainfall ( R ), evapotranspiration ( E ), and an autoregressive term (the soil moisture from the previous timestep, SM t − 1 ). The corresponding coefficients of the linear regression are β R , β E and β AR , respectively, along with an intercept term ( β 0 ). By introducing group level parameters via hierarchical priors on our β terms, we can explore the effects of site and treatment on the dynamics of soil moisture over time.
可解释贝叶斯土壤湿度模型的框架
土壤湿度是水文过程的关键驱动因素,如湿润期的洪水和干旱期的植被生长,但在时间和空间上具有很大的可变性。土壤湿度因土地覆盖、土壤类型、景观位置和降雨量的不同而不同。解开土壤湿度的不同驱动因素和空间关系对于提供预测非常重要。为了实现这一点,最广泛使用的模拟土壤湿度的方法是数值模拟。最近使用神经网络的方法显示出良好的预测性能,但失去了可解释性。相比之下,数值模型往往过于僵化,量化不确定性可能很困难,而且计算成本很高。本文的目的是展示一个灵活的贝叶斯建模框架,量化不确定性,理清不同驱动因素的相对重要性,并能够做出预测。这些数据来自Narrabri (NSW) Llara农场的密集土壤水分观测网络,该网络是作为景观补水项目的一部分安装的。该项目由两个40公顷的场地组成,每个场地都有控制区和处理区。处理包括安装1米高程的等高线堤防,以降低地上水流速度并增加入渗。考虑到它们的空间分布,每个量具具有不同的拓扑特征和土壤特征,这些特征也可能影响土壤湿度与强迫变量(例如,降雨和蒸散)的关系。为了进行建模,我们重点研究了16个月来在地表以下共同深度(200mm)的32个仪表的10分钟间隔数据。这些数据被汇总成每日平均值,与Llara农场附近雨量计的降雨量数据和从SILO下载的蒸散发数据保持一致。该模型是一个层次线性模型(HLM)拟合,使用贝叶斯方法利用NumPyro中实现的No-U-Turn MCMC采样器。hlm非常适合于对嵌套数据进行建模,例如在这种情况下,量规可以按地点和处理分组,同时还有量规特定的因素。时间t (smt)的土壤湿度在每个量程上被建模为降雨量(R)、蒸散发(E)和自回归项(前一个时间步的土壤湿度,smt−1)的简单线性回归。相应的线性回归系数分别为β R, β E和β AR,以及一个截距项(β 0)。通过在我们的β项上通过层次先验引入组水平参数,我们可以探索场地和处理对土壤水分随时间动态的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信