The Chinese “Discovery” of the Americas, Zheng He’s Voyages to the Indian Ocean, and Early Globalization

IF 0.2
Wu Yan, Zhongping Chen, S. Church
{"title":"The Chinese “Discovery” of the Americas, Zheng He’s Voyages to the Indian Ocean, and Early Globalization","authors":"Wu Yan, Zhongping Chen, S. Church","doi":"10.1163/2589465x-05010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article undertakes a thorough investigation of the assertion in recent publications, both Chinese and foreign, that Zheng He’s fleet “discovered” the Americas, and traces it back to its origins. It comprehensively examines all the major arguments that have been made concerning the question of whether Chinese people sailed to the Americas before Cristopher Columbus, from the pre-Qin dynasty to the early Ming dynasty. It reveals both contributions and problems of previous studies of the subject, pointing out how the various theories on this topic and surrounding discussion have evolved, the reliability and dubiousness of the various points of view, and the academic significance of the debate. As the long-standing academic dispute over this question, it has helped collect relevant American archaeological, written, and oral sources as well as other such historical data, and has brought to light related Chinese documents as well as ancient Chinese and foreign maps and other materials. The academic significance of the relevant scholarship also lies in the comparative study of the civilizations of ancient China and the Americas on opposite sides of the Pacific Ocean. Through the identification and thorough study of Chinese and foreign materials, careful, serious, and responsible historians have not only refuted the exaggerated claims for Chinese “discovery” of the Americas, but have also tried to reject the Sinocentrism that arises from these distortions. The scholars in China have also discovered, within the study of Zheng He’s maritime expeditions, the true aspects of their history that Chinese people can feel proud of. This article sifts through both the arguments and counterarguments as well as their respective evidence, and it pursues further textual research on relevant documents and materials for the purpose of examining the possibility for Chinese visits to the Americas before Columbus. Seen from the point of view of globalization, even if Zheng He’s fleet or other Chinese people reached the Americas before Columbus, their journey (which awaits confirmation) could not have had as much influence on the links between the New and Old Worlds as did those of later explorers. In spite of this, the seven large-scale voyages of Zheng He’s fleet in the Indian Ocean promoted maritime links within the Old World before Columbus’s great voyages in the Atlantic, making contributions to the history of globalization that are as important as those made later by Columbus.","PeriodicalId":193998,"journal":{"name":"China and Asia","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China and Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2589465x-05010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article undertakes a thorough investigation of the assertion in recent publications, both Chinese and foreign, that Zheng He’s fleet “discovered” the Americas, and traces it back to its origins. It comprehensively examines all the major arguments that have been made concerning the question of whether Chinese people sailed to the Americas before Cristopher Columbus, from the pre-Qin dynasty to the early Ming dynasty. It reveals both contributions and problems of previous studies of the subject, pointing out how the various theories on this topic and surrounding discussion have evolved, the reliability and dubiousness of the various points of view, and the academic significance of the debate. As the long-standing academic dispute over this question, it has helped collect relevant American archaeological, written, and oral sources as well as other such historical data, and has brought to light related Chinese documents as well as ancient Chinese and foreign maps and other materials. The academic significance of the relevant scholarship also lies in the comparative study of the civilizations of ancient China and the Americas on opposite sides of the Pacific Ocean. Through the identification and thorough study of Chinese and foreign materials, careful, serious, and responsible historians have not only refuted the exaggerated claims for Chinese “discovery” of the Americas, but have also tried to reject the Sinocentrism that arises from these distortions. The scholars in China have also discovered, within the study of Zheng He’s maritime expeditions, the true aspects of their history that Chinese people can feel proud of. This article sifts through both the arguments and counterarguments as well as their respective evidence, and it pursues further textual research on relevant documents and materials for the purpose of examining the possibility for Chinese visits to the Americas before Columbus. Seen from the point of view of globalization, even if Zheng He’s fleet or other Chinese people reached the Americas before Columbus, their journey (which awaits confirmation) could not have had as much influence on the links between the New and Old Worlds as did those of later explorers. In spite of this, the seven large-scale voyages of Zheng He’s fleet in the Indian Ocean promoted maritime links within the Old World before Columbus’s great voyages in the Atlantic, making contributions to the history of globalization that are as important as those made later by Columbus.
中国“发现”美洲、郑和下西洋与早期全球化
本文对国内外最近发表的断言进行了彻底的调查,这些断言认为郑和船队“发现”了美洲,并将其追溯到它的起源。该书全面考察了从先秦到明初,关于中国人是否在克里斯托弗·哥伦布之前航行到美洲的所有主要争论。它揭示了前人对该主题研究的贡献和问题,指出了关于该主题的各种理论和周围讨论是如何演变的,各种观点的可靠性和怀疑性,以及辩论的学术意义。作为这个问题的长期学术争论,它帮助收集了相关的美国考古、书面和口头资料以及其他此类历史资料,并揭示了相关的中国文献以及古代中国和外国地图和其他材料。相关学术研究的学术意义还在于对太平洋两岸的古代中国和美洲文明进行比较研究。细心、认真、负责任的历史学家通过对中外资料的鉴定和深入研究,不仅驳斥了中国“发现”美洲的夸大说法,而且试图驳斥由此产生的“中国中心主义”。在对郑和下西洋的研究中,中国的学者也发现了他们历史的真实一面,中国人可以为此感到自豪。本文对正反两种观点及其各自的证据进行了筛选,并对相关文件和材料进行了进一步的考证,以考察中国人在哥伦布之前访问美洲的可能性。从全球化的角度来看,即使郑和船队或其他中国人在哥伦布之前到达美洲,他们的旅程(有待证实)也不可能像后来的探险家那样对新旧世界之间的联系产生如此大的影响。尽管如此,在哥伦布的大西洋大航海之前,郑和船队在印度洋的七次大规模航行促进了旧大陆内部的海上联系,对全球化历史的贡献与后来哥伦布的贡献一样重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书