A Comparison on the Classification of Short-text Documents Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation and Formal Concept Analysis

Noel Rogers, L. Longo
{"title":"A Comparison on the Classification of Short-text Documents Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation and Formal Concept Analysis","authors":"Noel Rogers, L. Longo","doi":"10.21427/D7XR39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing amounts of textual data being collected online, automated text classification techniques are becoming increasingly important. However, a lot of this data is in the form of short-text with just a handful of terms per document (e.g. Text messages, tweets or Facebook posts). This data is generally too sparse and noisy to obtain satisfactory classification. Two techniques which aim to alleviate this problem are Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Formal Concept Analysis (FCA). Both techniques have been shown to improve the performance of short-text classification by reducing the sparsity of the input data. The relative performance of classifiers that have been enhanced using each technique has not been directly compared so, to address this issue, this work presents an experiment to compare them, using supervised models. It has shown that FCA leads to a much higher degree of correlation among terms than LDA and initially gives lower classification accuracy. However, once a subset of features is selected for training, the FCA models can outperform those trained on LDA expanded data.","PeriodicalId":286718,"journal":{"name":"Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21427/D7XR39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

With the increasing amounts of textual data being collected online, automated text classification techniques are becoming increasingly important. However, a lot of this data is in the form of short-text with just a handful of terms per document (e.g. Text messages, tweets or Facebook posts). This data is generally too sparse and noisy to obtain satisfactory classification. Two techniques which aim to alleviate this problem are Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Formal Concept Analysis (FCA). Both techniques have been shown to improve the performance of short-text classification by reducing the sparsity of the input data. The relative performance of classifiers that have been enhanced using each technique has not been directly compared so, to address this issue, this work presents an experiment to compare them, using supervised models. It has shown that FCA leads to a much higher degree of correlation among terms than LDA and initially gives lower classification accuracy. However, once a subset of features is selected for training, the FCA models can outperform those trained on LDA expanded data.
基于潜狄利克雷分配和形式概念分析的短文本文档分类比较
随着在线收集的文本数据量的增加,自动文本分类技术变得越来越重要。然而,很多数据都是短文本形式的,每个文档只有少数几个术语(例如文本消息、tweet或Facebook帖子)。这些数据通常过于稀疏和嘈杂,无法获得令人满意的分类。潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)和形式概念分析(FCA)是缓解这一问题的两种技术。这两种技术都通过降低输入数据的稀疏性来提高短文本分类的性能。使用每种技术增强的分类器的相对性能没有被直接比较,因此,为了解决这个问题,本工作提出了一个实验来比较它们,使用监督模型。结果表明,与LDA相比,FCA导致术语之间的相关程度要高得多,并且最初给出的分类精度较低。然而,一旦选择了特征子集进行训练,FCA模型的性能就会优于那些在LDA扩展数据上训练的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信