Comparing the Quality of Numeracy Assessment Methods in Healthcare

M. Omidbakhsh, O. Ormandjieva
{"title":"Comparing the Quality of Numeracy Assessment Methods in Healthcare","authors":"M. Omidbakhsh, O. Ormandjieva","doi":"10.1109/CBMS.2017.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numeracy skill level of patients has great influence on their preferences and priorities for the treatment options concerning their healthcare. There have been different methods for assessment of numeracy skill in healthcare domain. In our previous research we proposed a new Confidence-based Patient Numeracy Assessment (C-PNA) method. In this paper we compare it with other numeracy assessment methods in terms of newly proposed quality characteristics. The results reveal that our confidence-based numeracy assessment method outperforms the non-confidence assessment method in terms of objective and subjective quality characteristics of the newly proposed quality model.","PeriodicalId":141105,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2017.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numeracy skill level of patients has great influence on their preferences and priorities for the treatment options concerning their healthcare. There have been different methods for assessment of numeracy skill in healthcare domain. In our previous research we proposed a new Confidence-based Patient Numeracy Assessment (C-PNA) method. In this paper we compare it with other numeracy assessment methods in terms of newly proposed quality characteristics. The results reveal that our confidence-based numeracy assessment method outperforms the non-confidence assessment method in terms of objective and subjective quality characteristics of the newly proposed quality model.
医疗卫生计算能力评估方法的质量比较
患者的计算技能水平对其医疗保健治疗方案的偏好和优先级有很大影响。在医疗保健领域,有不同的方法来评估计算技能。在我们之前的研究中,我们提出了一种新的基于信心的患者算术评估(C-PNA)方法。本文就新提出的质量特征与其他计算能力评价方法进行了比较。结果表明,基于置信度的数学评估方法在客观和主观质量特征方面都优于非置信度评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信