{"title":"Resisting educational inequity and the ‘bracketing out’ of disadvantage in contemporary schooling","authors":"S. Riddle","doi":"10.4324/9781315109268-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, data from Australia’s National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN), the My School website and the Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage (ICSEA) are considered together in order to draw out a nuanced view of how broader factors of social disadvantage are implicated in educational outcomes measured via standardised testing regimes. Of particular concern is the bracketing out (Sellar & Lingard, 2014) of social, economic and educational disadvantage, which allows policy makers, education commentators and school leaders to make claims about students, teachers and schools (Thompson & Mockler, 2016) that are decontextualised and overly simplified.","PeriodicalId":224835,"journal":{"name":"Resisting Educational Inequality","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resisting Educational Inequality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109268-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
In this chapter, data from Australia’s National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN), the My School website and the Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage (ICSEA) are considered together in order to draw out a nuanced view of how broader factors of social disadvantage are implicated in educational outcomes measured via standardised testing regimes. Of particular concern is the bracketing out (Sellar & Lingard, 2014) of social, economic and educational disadvantage, which allows policy makers, education commentators and school leaders to make claims about students, teachers and schools (Thompson & Mockler, 2016) that are decontextualised and overly simplified.