A breath of fresh air

Elly Tseng, Dale Chen
{"title":"A breath of fresh air","authors":"Elly Tseng, Dale Chen","doi":"10.47339/ephj.2020.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In recent years, there have been an increasing number of wildfire events. The effects of global climate change play a big role in the severity and length of these wildfire events. Prolonged periods of wildfire smoke in the air can negatively impact health by causing respiratory distress and exacerbating pre-existing conditions. Many regions have implemented smoke mitigation methods like community clean air shelters, but risk perception can influence whether or not these methods are effectively used. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk perception of residents in British Columbia regarding wildfire smoke inhalation and smoke mitigation methods. Methods A survey was distributed to residents living in British Columbia to evaluate their risk perception of wildfire smoke and use of smoke mitigation methods. The online survey was created with Survey Monkey, distributed via Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit, and took approximately five minutes to complete. The results were collected in Microsoft Excel and analyzed with NCSS statistical software. Results Chi-square tests showed a significant association between gender and the risk perception of inhaling wildfire smoke, exercising outdoors during a smoke event, going outside during an air quality advisory, and the decision to find a clean air space during a smoke event. There were some associations with age and geographical region as well. Results showed that most people practice some form of smoke mitigation, such as staying indoors, seeking refuge in a clean air space, and using masks and/or portable air filters. Conclusions Based on the results, gender has a significant impact on risk perception of wildfire smoke inhalation. Other demographics, such as age, geographical region, education, and ethnicity, did not display many significant associations. This study also identified that participants may have conflicting views about the protectiveness of a surgical/cloth mask during a smoke event. Most participants practiced some form of smoke mitigation method, like staying indoors.","PeriodicalId":433101,"journal":{"name":"BCIT Environmental Public Health Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCIT Environmental Public Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47339/ephj.2020.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In recent years, there have been an increasing number of wildfire events. The effects of global climate change play a big role in the severity and length of these wildfire events. Prolonged periods of wildfire smoke in the air can negatively impact health by causing respiratory distress and exacerbating pre-existing conditions. Many regions have implemented smoke mitigation methods like community clean air shelters, but risk perception can influence whether or not these methods are effectively used. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk perception of residents in British Columbia regarding wildfire smoke inhalation and smoke mitigation methods. Methods A survey was distributed to residents living in British Columbia to evaluate their risk perception of wildfire smoke and use of smoke mitigation methods. The online survey was created with Survey Monkey, distributed via Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit, and took approximately five minutes to complete. The results were collected in Microsoft Excel and analyzed with NCSS statistical software. Results Chi-square tests showed a significant association between gender and the risk perception of inhaling wildfire smoke, exercising outdoors during a smoke event, going outside during an air quality advisory, and the decision to find a clean air space during a smoke event. There were some associations with age and geographical region as well. Results showed that most people practice some form of smoke mitigation, such as staying indoors, seeking refuge in a clean air space, and using masks and/or portable air filters. Conclusions Based on the results, gender has a significant impact on risk perception of wildfire smoke inhalation. Other demographics, such as age, geographical region, education, and ethnicity, did not display many significant associations. This study also identified that participants may have conflicting views about the protectiveness of a surgical/cloth mask during a smoke event. Most participants practiced some form of smoke mitigation method, like staying indoors.
呼吸新鲜空气
近年来,野火事件越来越多。全球气候变化的影响在这些野火事件的严重程度和持续时间方面发挥了重要作用。空气中长时间的野火烟雾会引起呼吸窘迫和加剧原有疾病,从而对健康产生负面影响。许多地区已经实施了社区清洁空气庇护所等烟雾缓解方法,但风险认知会影响这些方法是否得到有效利用。本研究的目的是评估不列颠哥伦比亚省居民对野火烟雾吸入和烟雾缓解方法的风险感知。方法对不列颠哥伦比亚省居民进行调查,评估他们对野火烟雾的风险认知和烟雾缓解方法的使用情况。这项在线调查是由survey Monkey创建的,通过Facebook、Twitter和Reddit发布,耗时约5分钟。结果在Microsoft Excel中收集,并使用NCSS统计软件进行分析。结果卡方检验显示,性别与吸入野火烟雾的风险感知、在烟雾事件期间进行户外锻炼、在空气质量咨询期间外出以及在烟雾事件期间寻找清洁空气空间的决定之间存在显著关联。年龄和地理区域也有一定的联系。结果显示,大多数人都采取了某种形式的烟雾缓解措施,例如呆在室内,在空气干净的地方寻求庇护,以及使用口罩和/或便携式空气过滤器。结论性别对野火烟雾吸入风险感知有显著影响。其他人口统计数据,如年龄、地理区域、教育程度和种族,没有显示出许多显著的关联。本研究还发现,在烟雾事件中,参与者可能对外科口罩/布口罩的保护作用有不同的看法。大多数参与者都采取了某种形式的烟雾缓解方法,比如待在室内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信