Clarifying Questions in Math Information Retrieval

Behrooz Mansouri, Zahra Jahedibashiz
{"title":"Clarifying Questions in Math Information Retrieval","authors":"Behrooz Mansouri, Zahra Jahedibashiz","doi":"10.1145/3578337.3605123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the challenges of math information retrieval is the inherent ambiguity of mathematical notation. The use of various notations, symbols, and conventions can lead to ambiguities in math search queries, potentially causing confusion and errors. Therefore, asking clarifying questions in math search can help remove these ambiguities. Despite advances in incorporating clarifying questions for search, little is currently understood about the characteristics of these questions in math. This paper investigates math clarifying questions asked on the MathStackExchange community question answering platform, analyzing a total of 495,431 clarifying questions and their usefulness. The results of the analysis uncover specific patterns in useful clarifying questions that provide insight into the design considerations for future conversational math search systems. The formulae used in clarifying questions are closely related to those in the initial queries and are accompanied by common phrases, seeking for the missing information related to the formulae. Additionally, experiments utilizing clarifying questions for math search demonstrate the potential benefits of incorporating them alongside the original query.","PeriodicalId":415621,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","volume":"229 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3578337.3605123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the challenges of math information retrieval is the inherent ambiguity of mathematical notation. The use of various notations, symbols, and conventions can lead to ambiguities in math search queries, potentially causing confusion and errors. Therefore, asking clarifying questions in math search can help remove these ambiguities. Despite advances in incorporating clarifying questions for search, little is currently understood about the characteristics of these questions in math. This paper investigates math clarifying questions asked on the MathStackExchange community question answering platform, analyzing a total of 495,431 clarifying questions and their usefulness. The results of the analysis uncover specific patterns in useful clarifying questions that provide insight into the design considerations for future conversational math search systems. The formulae used in clarifying questions are closely related to those in the initial queries and are accompanied by common phrases, seeking for the missing information related to the formulae. Additionally, experiments utilizing clarifying questions for math search demonstrate the potential benefits of incorporating them alongside the original query.
澄清数学信息检索中的问题
数学信息检索面临的挑战之一是数学符号固有的模糊性。使用各种记号、符号和约定可能导致数学搜索查询中的歧义,从而可能导致混淆和错误。因此,在数学搜索中提出澄清性问题可以帮助消除这些歧义。尽管在将澄清问题纳入搜索方面取得了进展,但目前对数学中这些问题的特征知之甚少。本文调查了MathStackExchange社区问答平台上提出的数学澄清问题,分析了495,431个澄清问题及其有用性。分析的结果揭示了有用的澄清问题中的特定模式,这些问题为未来会话式数学搜索系统的设计考虑提供了见解。澄清问题时使用的公式与最初的问题密切相关,并附有常用短语,以寻找与公式相关的缺失信息。此外,在数学搜索中使用澄清问题的实验证明了将它们与原始查询合并在一起的潜在好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信