From slacktivism to activism: participatory culture in the age of social media

D. Rotman, Sarah Vieweg, S. Schoenebeck, Ed H. Chi, J. Preece, B. Shneiderman, P. Pirolli, T. Glaisyer
{"title":"From slacktivism to activism: participatory culture in the age of social media","authors":"D. Rotman, Sarah Vieweg, S. Schoenebeck, Ed H. Chi, J. Preece, B. Shneiderman, P. Pirolli, T. Glaisyer","doi":"10.1145/1979742.1979543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social networking sites (e.g. Facebook), microblogging services (e.g. Twitter), and content-sharing sites (e.g. YouTube and Flickr) have introduced the opportunity for wide-scale, online social participation. Visibility of national and international priorities such as public health, political unrest, disaster relief, and climate change has increased, yet we know little about the benefits - and possible costs - of engaging in social activism via social media. These powerful social issues introduce a need for scientific research into technology mediated social participation. What are the actual, tangible benefits of \"greening\" Twitter profile pictures in support of the Iranian elections? Does cartooning a Facebook profile picture really raise awareness of child abuse? Are there unintended negative effects through low-risk, low-cost technology-mediated participation? And, is there a difference - in both outcome and engagement level - between different types of online social activism? This SIG will investigate technology mediated social participation through a critical lens, discussing both the potential positive and negative outcomes of such participation. Approaches to designing for increased participation, evaluating effects of participation, and next steps in scientific research directions will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":275462,"journal":{"name":"CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"152","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 152

Abstract

Social networking sites (e.g. Facebook), microblogging services (e.g. Twitter), and content-sharing sites (e.g. YouTube and Flickr) have introduced the opportunity for wide-scale, online social participation. Visibility of national and international priorities such as public health, political unrest, disaster relief, and climate change has increased, yet we know little about the benefits - and possible costs - of engaging in social activism via social media. These powerful social issues introduce a need for scientific research into technology mediated social participation. What are the actual, tangible benefits of "greening" Twitter profile pictures in support of the Iranian elections? Does cartooning a Facebook profile picture really raise awareness of child abuse? Are there unintended negative effects through low-risk, low-cost technology-mediated participation? And, is there a difference - in both outcome and engagement level - between different types of online social activism? This SIG will investigate technology mediated social participation through a critical lens, discussing both the potential positive and negative outcomes of such participation. Approaches to designing for increased participation, evaluating effects of participation, and next steps in scientific research directions will be discussed.
从懒汉行动主义到行动主义:社交媒体时代的参与性文化
社交网站(如Facebook)、微博服务(如Twitter)和内容共享网站(如YouTube和Flickr)为大规模的在线社会参与提供了机会。公共卫生、政治动荡、救灾和气候变化等国家和国际优先事项的可见度有所提高,但我们对通过社交媒体参与社会活动的好处和可能的成本知之甚少。这些强有力的社会问题促使人们需要对技术介导的社会参与进行科学研究。“绿化”推特头像以支持伊朗大选的实际、切实的好处是什么?漫画脸书头像真的能引起人们对虐待儿童的关注吗?低风险、低成本的技术参与是否会产生意想不到的负面影响?不同类型的网络社会活动在结果和参与程度上是否存在差异?本研究小组将通过批判性的视角调查技术介导的社会参与,讨论这种参与的潜在积极和消极结果。本文将讨论为增加参与而设计的方法、评估参与的效果以及科学研究方向的下一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信