Efficiency of NonLife Insurance Business in Kenya: Stochastic Frontier Approach

Victor N. Mose
{"title":"Efficiency of NonLife Insurance Business in Kenya: Stochastic Frontier Approach","authors":"Victor N. Mose","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2262754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study investigates the efficiency of nonlife insurance business in Kenya over the period 2006-2012 using stochastic frontier approach and establishes an industry efficiency of 72% over the period. The efficiency scores per year were; 2006 (67%), 2007 (69%), 2008 (61%), 2009 (73%), 2010 (99%), 2011 (73%) and 2012 (69%). Small and medium scale firms are catching up with large scale firms in terms of efficiency. Branch network and county coverage positively influence efficiency. Firms with 21-30 years of age are the most efficient cohort. There is no significant difference in efficiency between specialized nonlife and composite, domestic and foreign owned firms and between firms with regional and national underwriting orientation. Elasticity of the sum of net earned premiums and investment income to changes in commissions expenditure, management expenses and capital ranged between (0.2-0.6), (0.2-0.5) and (0.1-0.3) respectively, over the period. Deviations in profitability and claims paid across firms are wide translating to industry potential for cross-firm reinsurance. The profitability is positively correlated with claims paid across firms indicating sustained industry capacity to settle claims. In order to increase efficiency competitiveness firms should continue expanding their branch network and county coverage across Kenya, increase capitalization and innovate on investment portfolio. Deviations in profitability and underwriting risk across firms point to merging of firms, formation of strong cross-firm reinsurance ties, increasing of insurance penetration and investment returns, and enhancing client risk profiling and customer education on risk prevention as critical strategies towards increasing industry stability and sharing of claims settlement responsibilities.","PeriodicalId":106740,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Econometric Model Construction","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Econometric Model Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2262754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study investigates the efficiency of nonlife insurance business in Kenya over the period 2006-2012 using stochastic frontier approach and establishes an industry efficiency of 72% over the period. The efficiency scores per year were; 2006 (67%), 2007 (69%), 2008 (61%), 2009 (73%), 2010 (99%), 2011 (73%) and 2012 (69%). Small and medium scale firms are catching up with large scale firms in terms of efficiency. Branch network and county coverage positively influence efficiency. Firms with 21-30 years of age are the most efficient cohort. There is no significant difference in efficiency between specialized nonlife and composite, domestic and foreign owned firms and between firms with regional and national underwriting orientation. Elasticity of the sum of net earned premiums and investment income to changes in commissions expenditure, management expenses and capital ranged between (0.2-0.6), (0.2-0.5) and (0.1-0.3) respectively, over the period. Deviations in profitability and claims paid across firms are wide translating to industry potential for cross-firm reinsurance. The profitability is positively correlated with claims paid across firms indicating sustained industry capacity to settle claims. In order to increase efficiency competitiveness firms should continue expanding their branch network and county coverage across Kenya, increase capitalization and innovate on investment portfolio. Deviations in profitability and underwriting risk across firms point to merging of firms, formation of strong cross-firm reinsurance ties, increasing of insurance penetration and investment returns, and enhancing client risk profiling and customer education on risk prevention as critical strategies towards increasing industry stability and sharing of claims settlement responsibilities.
肯尼亚非寿险业务效率:随机前沿方法
本研究采用随机前沿方法对2006-2012年期间肯尼亚非寿险业务的效率进行了调查,并建立了该期间内72%的行业效率。每年的效率得分为;2006(67%)、2007年(69%)、2008年(61%)、2009年(73%)、2010年(99%)、2011年(73%)和2012年(69%)。在效率方面,中小型企业正在赶上大型企业。分支网络和县域覆盖率对效率有积极影响。21-30岁的公司是最有效率的群体。非寿险专业公司与综合类公司、内资公司与外资公司、区域承保导向公司与国家承保导向公司之间的效率无显著差异。期内,净赚保费及投资收益总和对佣金开支、管理开支及资本变动的弹性分别介于(0.2-0.6)、(0.2-0.5)及(0.1-0.3)之间。公司间盈利能力和理赔的差异广泛转化为跨公司再保险的行业潜力。盈利能力与各公司支付的索赔呈正相关,表明行业有持续的理赔能力。为了提高效率和竞争力,企业应继续扩大其在肯尼亚的分支网络和县覆盖范围,增加资本化和投资组合创新。公司之间盈利能力和承保风险的差异表明,公司合并、形成强大的跨公司再保险关系、增加保险渗透率和投资回报、加强客户风险概况和客户风险预防教育是提高行业稳定性和分担理赔责任的关键策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信