Management indicators model to evaluate performance of IT organizations

A.J. Bianchi
{"title":"Management indicators model to evaluate performance of IT organizations","authors":"A.J. Bianchi","doi":"10.1109/PICMET.2001.952021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no arguing nowadays about the importance of IT for the growth and competitive edge of organizations. But if technology is to be a true asset for a company, it must be aligned with the business strategic goals by means of a formalized system of strategic planning, maturity of development process, technology management and corporative quality vision. The accrued benefits can be manifold: the development of training and learning environments for an effective improvement of procedures and product quality, efficient use of assets and resources, opportunity for innovation and technologic advancement, an approach to problem solving in areas critical to the organization among others. Many companies make use of these practices, but find it hard to evaluate how effective they are and what is the final quality of the achieved results at diverse customer levels both in project vision and the continuity of service. One cause of these drawbacks is failure to apply measurement models which provide objective pointers to assess how effective the IT strategies used have actually been considering the strategic business goals. To incorporate models of measures is no easy task because it entails working on several aspects: technical, processes, products and the peculiar culture of each organization. This paper presents a model of indicators to evaluate IT performance using three well known methods: balanced scorecard, GQM and PSM.","PeriodicalId":117603,"journal":{"name":"PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2001.952021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

There is no arguing nowadays about the importance of IT for the growth and competitive edge of organizations. But if technology is to be a true asset for a company, it must be aligned with the business strategic goals by means of a formalized system of strategic planning, maturity of development process, technology management and corporative quality vision. The accrued benefits can be manifold: the development of training and learning environments for an effective improvement of procedures and product quality, efficient use of assets and resources, opportunity for innovation and technologic advancement, an approach to problem solving in areas critical to the organization among others. Many companies make use of these practices, but find it hard to evaluate how effective they are and what is the final quality of the achieved results at diverse customer levels both in project vision and the continuity of service. One cause of these drawbacks is failure to apply measurement models which provide objective pointers to assess how effective the IT strategies used have actually been considering the strategic business goals. To incorporate models of measures is no easy task because it entails working on several aspects: technical, processes, products and the peculiar culture of each organization. This paper presents a model of indicators to evaluate IT performance using three well known methods: balanced scorecard, GQM and PSM.
评估IT组织绩效的管理指标模型
如今,IT对于组织的成长和竞争优势的重要性是毋庸置疑的。但是,如果技术要成为一个公司的真正资产,它必须通过一个正式的战略规划系统、成熟的开发过程、技术管理和企业质量愿景来与业务战略目标保持一致。累积的收益可以是多方面的:为有效改进程序和产品质量而开发的培训和学习环境,有效利用资产和资源,创新和技术进步的机会,在对组织至关重要的领域解决问题的方法等等。许多公司使用这些实践,但发现很难评估它们的有效性,以及在项目愿景和服务连续性方面在不同客户级别上取得的最终结果的质量如何。这些缺点的一个原因是未能应用度量模型,这些模型提供了客观的指针来评估所使用的IT策略在实际考虑战略业务目标时的有效性。合并度量模型并非易事,因为它需要在几个方面进行工作:技术、过程、产品和每个组织的特殊文化。本文提出了一个指标模型来评估IT绩效使用三种众所周知的方法:平衡计分卡,GQM和PSM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信