Exploring Diversity Management to Avoid Social Washing and Pinkwashing: Using Bibliometric Analysis to Shape Future Research Directions

Federico Lanzalonga, Federico Chmet, Basilio Petrolo, V. Brescia
{"title":"Exploring Diversity Management to Avoid Social Washing and Pinkwashing: Using Bibliometric Analysis to Shape Future Research Directions","authors":"Federico Lanzalonga, Federico Chmet, Basilio Petrolo, V. Brescia","doi":"10.2478/joim-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have been a significant focus of environmental, social and governance sustainability research. Diversity management is one of the challenges faced by corporate governance in achieving SDG 4, 5, 8, and 10. However, rapid demographic changes in the global workforce create significant challenges for human resource development professionals when focusing on diversity management. This paper aims to define the different perspectives of diversity management to avoid sustainability distortions such as social washing and pinkwashing, which promote the perception that policies or products of a given company are socially responsible. Methodology The analysis of the existing literature can provide the information necessary to answer the research questions using rigorous scientific research methods. In the present study bibliometric analysis was used to enable a thorough and reliable analysis of knowledge on the topic and the identification of future progress. Bibliometric analysis was used to investigate the final pool of 126 peer-reviewed articles. Findings Contributions include advancing the understanding of diversity management, highlighting the dominance of communication bias, and strengthening the connection between social sustainability and the individual by identifying social exchange theory as a tool for explaining the ongoing changes in corporate governance. Value added The paper aims to answer research questions related to the journals relevant to the study of diversity management, the geographical structure of the research flow on diversity management, and the possible implications for future research on this topic. Recommendations In light of the clusters identified, it is recommended that forthcoming researchers explore the fitting theories that can be used to elucidate the phenomenon of diversity management. In addition, interdisciplinary research can facilitate a deeper understanding of issues concerning identity and gender, thereby enhancing the knowledge of diversity among managers. The paper recommends that future studies emphasize the differences in diversity management between national and multinational companies expanding the knowledge by conducting multiple case studies.","PeriodicalId":302686,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intercultural Management","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intercultural Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have been a significant focus of environmental, social and governance sustainability research. Diversity management is one of the challenges faced by corporate governance in achieving SDG 4, 5, 8, and 10. However, rapid demographic changes in the global workforce create significant challenges for human resource development professionals when focusing on diversity management. This paper aims to define the different perspectives of diversity management to avoid sustainability distortions such as social washing and pinkwashing, which promote the perception that policies or products of a given company are socially responsible. Methodology The analysis of the existing literature can provide the information necessary to answer the research questions using rigorous scientific research methods. In the present study bibliometric analysis was used to enable a thorough and reliable analysis of knowledge on the topic and the identification of future progress. Bibliometric analysis was used to investigate the final pool of 126 peer-reviewed articles. Findings Contributions include advancing the understanding of diversity management, highlighting the dominance of communication bias, and strengthening the connection between social sustainability and the individual by identifying social exchange theory as a tool for explaining the ongoing changes in corporate governance. Value added The paper aims to answer research questions related to the journals relevant to the study of diversity management, the geographical structure of the research flow on diversity management, and the possible implications for future research on this topic. Recommendations In light of the clusters identified, it is recommended that forthcoming researchers explore the fitting theories that can be used to elucidate the phenomenon of diversity management. In addition, interdisciplinary research can facilitate a deeper understanding of issues concerning identity and gender, thereby enhancing the knowledge of diversity among managers. The paper recommends that future studies emphasize the differences in diversity management between national and multinational companies expanding the knowledge by conducting multiple case studies.
探讨多样性管理避免社会洗白与粉红洗白:运用文献计量分析塑造未来研究方向
可持续发展目标(SDGs)一直是环境、社会和治理可持续性研究的重要焦点。多样性管理是公司治理在实现可持续发展目标4、5、8和10时面临的挑战之一。然而,全球劳动力人口结构的快速变化给人力资源开发专业人员在关注多样性管理时带来了重大挑战。本文旨在定义多样性管理的不同视角,以避免可持续性扭曲,如社会洗涤和粉红色洗涤,这促进了特定公司的政策或产品具有社会责任的看法。对现有文献的分析可以提供必要的信息,用严谨的科学研究方法回答研究问题。在本研究中,文献计量学分析被用于对该主题的知识进行彻底和可靠的分析,并确定未来的进展。文献计量学分析用于调查126篇同行评议文章的最终库。贡献包括推进对多样性管理的理解,强调沟通偏见的主导地位,并通过将社会交换理论作为解释公司治理持续变化的工具来加强社会可持续性与个人之间的联系。本文旨在回答与多样性管理研究相关的期刊、多样性管理研究流程的地理结构以及对该主题未来研究可能产生的影响相关的研究问题。根据所确定的集群,建议未来的研究人员探索可用于阐明多样性管理现象的合适理论。此外,跨学科研究可以促进对身份和性别问题的更深入的了解,从而提高管理人员之间的多样性知识。本文建议未来的研究应强调国内公司和跨国公司在多样性管理方面的差异,并通过开展多个案例研究来扩大知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信