Eating and Mourning the Corpse of the World: Ecological Cannibalism and Elegiac Protomourning in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road

D. Huebert
{"title":"Eating and Mourning the Corpse of the World: Ecological Cannibalism and Elegiac Protomourning in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road","authors":"D. Huebert","doi":"10.5325/CORMMCCAJ.15.1.0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cormac McCarthy’s ecopocalyptic novel, The Road (2006), is rife with cannibalism. Throughout McCarthy’s oeuvre, however, cannibalism is not common; it only appears in one previous novel and does not earn an entry in the index of The Cambridge Companion to Cormac McCarthy (2013). This article argues that the abundance of cannibalism in this novel is not incidental. Rather, McCarthy’s frequent depictions of cannibalism within the setting of ecological apocalypse encourages the reader to pair these two aspects of the text; The Road suggests that insofar as the planetary ecosystem is the “body” of the human species, recent human history has been a spectacle of the particular type of species self-cannibalization I call “ecological cannibalism.” This article questions the novel’s apparently clear moral dichotomy between “good guys” and bad guys (129), arguing that the man and the boy are not fundamentally distinct from human meat-eaters. Rather, an ecological perspective reveals a nebulous ethical zone that complicates McCarthy’s ostensible bifurcation of characters into the categories of unequivocal good and evil. Finally, this article argues that McCarthy tempers the novel’s tendency toward environmentalist proselytizing by engaging in what I call “elegiac protomourning,” a literary technique that acknowledges the bare reality of loss rather than simply re-emphasizing the environmentalist drive to conserve.","PeriodicalId":126318,"journal":{"name":"The Cormac McCarthy Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cormac McCarthy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CORMMCCAJ.15.1.0066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Cormac McCarthy’s ecopocalyptic novel, The Road (2006), is rife with cannibalism. Throughout McCarthy’s oeuvre, however, cannibalism is not common; it only appears in one previous novel and does not earn an entry in the index of The Cambridge Companion to Cormac McCarthy (2013). This article argues that the abundance of cannibalism in this novel is not incidental. Rather, McCarthy’s frequent depictions of cannibalism within the setting of ecological apocalypse encourages the reader to pair these two aspects of the text; The Road suggests that insofar as the planetary ecosystem is the “body” of the human species, recent human history has been a spectacle of the particular type of species self-cannibalization I call “ecological cannibalism.” This article questions the novel’s apparently clear moral dichotomy between “good guys” and bad guys (129), arguing that the man and the boy are not fundamentally distinct from human meat-eaters. Rather, an ecological perspective reveals a nebulous ethical zone that complicates McCarthy’s ostensible bifurcation of characters into the categories of unequivocal good and evil. Finally, this article argues that McCarthy tempers the novel’s tendency toward environmentalist proselytizing by engaging in what I call “elegiac protomourning,” a literary technique that acknowledges the bare reality of loss rather than simply re-emphasizing the environmentalist drive to conserve.
吃和哀悼世界的尸体:科马克·麦卡锡的《路》中的生态食人和哀歌式的原始哀悼
科马克·麦卡锡的生态启示录小说《路》(2006)充斥着食人的情节。然而,在麦卡锡的全部作品中,同类相食并不常见;它只在之前的一部小说中出现过,也没有出现在《剑桥科马克·麦卡锡指南》(2013)的索引中。这篇文章认为,这本小说中大量的同类相食并不是偶然的。相反,麦卡锡在生态启示录的背景下频繁描绘同类相食,鼓励读者将文本的这两个方面结合起来;《生命之路》表明,就行星生态系统是人类物种的“身体”而言,最近的人类历史一直是一种特殊类型的物种自我同类相食的奇观,我称之为“生态同类相食”。这篇文章质疑小说中“好人”和“坏人”之间明显的道德二分法(129),认为男人和男孩与人类肉食者并没有根本的区别。相反,生态学的视角揭示了一个模糊的伦理区域,这使麦卡锡表面上的人物分化为明确的善与恶的类别变得复杂。最后,本文认为,麦卡锡通过我所说的“哀歌式的悼念”,缓和了小说中环境主义者的改变倾向,这是一种文学技巧,承认损失的现实,而不是简单地再次强调环境保护主义者的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信