As If They Had Been Joined by a Clergyman

T. D. Parry
{"title":"As If They Had Been Joined by a Clergyman","authors":"T. D. Parry","doi":"10.5149/northcarolina/9781469660868.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter makes an important intervention in the existing scholarship of slave marriage in the United States and the centrality of “jumping the broom” in that historiography. It analyzes the ceremony’s diverse expressions throughout the antebellum South, arguing that enslaved people in different areas, similarly to their British counterparts, reimagined it for their own community’s preferences. The chapter then draws upon various narratives to examines how gender and social status were infused into the custom, showcasing how it reflected contests of dominance and domestic equality. It also overturns assumptions that the ceremony was universal among the enslaved, as many testimonials reveal it was largely associated with “field hands,” while those enslaved in the plantation house claimed to receive elaborate weddings that included Christian ministers. The chapter dismantles several myths that are now associated with the custom by historicizing the motivations for people who used it while simultaneously explaining why others rejected it. The chapter also provides a number of graphs and charts, which display how different practitioners performed the ritual differently and used it for different purposes.","PeriodicalId":229634,"journal":{"name":"Jumping the Broom","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jumping the Broom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469660868.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter makes an important intervention in the existing scholarship of slave marriage in the United States and the centrality of “jumping the broom” in that historiography. It analyzes the ceremony’s diverse expressions throughout the antebellum South, arguing that enslaved people in different areas, similarly to their British counterparts, reimagined it for their own community’s preferences. The chapter then draws upon various narratives to examines how gender and social status were infused into the custom, showcasing how it reflected contests of dominance and domestic equality. It also overturns assumptions that the ceremony was universal among the enslaved, as many testimonials reveal it was largely associated with “field hands,” while those enslaved in the plantation house claimed to receive elaborate weddings that included Christian ministers. The chapter dismantles several myths that are now associated with the custom by historicizing the motivations for people who used it while simultaneously explaining why others rejected it. The chapter also provides a number of graphs and charts, which display how different practitioners performed the ritual differently and used it for different purposes.
好像有一个牧师加入了他们的行列
这一章对现有的美国奴隶婚姻学术研究以及“跳扫帚”在历史编纂中的中心地位进行了重要的干预。它分析了南北战争前南方各州庆祝仪式的不同表达方式,认为不同地区的奴隶,与他们的英国同胞一样,根据自己社区的喜好重新构想了庆祝仪式。然后,本章利用不同的叙述来研究性别和社会地位是如何融入习俗的,展示它是如何反映支配地位和家庭平等的竞争的。它也推翻了这种仪式在奴隶中普遍存在的假设,因为许多证词显示,它主要与“田间工人”有关,而那些在种植园里被奴役的人声称接受了包括基督教牧师在内的精心设计的婚礼。这一章通过将使用这一习俗的人们的动机历史化,同时解释了为什么其他人拒绝使用这一习俗,从而揭开了与这一习俗有关的几个神话。本章还提供了一些图表,展示了不同的实践者如何以不同的方式进行仪式,并将其用于不同的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信