Assessment and evaluation of requirements elicitation techniques using analysis determination requirements framework

Souhaib Besrour, Lukman Bin Ab Rahim, P. Dominic
{"title":"Assessment and evaluation of requirements elicitation techniques using analysis determination requirements framework","authors":"Souhaib Besrour, Lukman Bin Ab Rahim, P. Dominic","doi":"10.1109/ICCOINS.2014.6868446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous requirements engineering methods have been proposed to improve the quality of requirements documents and to increase customer satisfaction with the final product. However, the choosing between various techniques may be confusing and puzzling. Therefore, this paper aims to present an empirical study to assess requirement analysis techniques, highlight their key features, strength and limitations. The empirical study results show a high competitiveness between requirement engineering techniques and slight score differences among them. Statistics shows that Interview technique is the uppermost obtained score among all techniques, followed by JAD and Brainstorming technique.","PeriodicalId":368100,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS)","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCOINS.2014.6868446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Numerous requirements engineering methods have been proposed to improve the quality of requirements documents and to increase customer satisfaction with the final product. However, the choosing between various techniques may be confusing and puzzling. Therefore, this paper aims to present an empirical study to assess requirement analysis techniques, highlight their key features, strength and limitations. The empirical study results show a high competitiveness between requirement engineering techniques and slight score differences among them. Statistics shows that Interview technique is the uppermost obtained score among all techniques, followed by JAD and Brainstorming technique.
使用分析确定需求框架评估和评价需求引出技术
已经提出了许多需求工程方法来提高需求文档的质量,并增加客户对最终产品的满意度。然而,在各种技术之间的选择可能会令人困惑和困惑。因此,本文旨在通过实证研究来评估需求分析技术,突出其主要特点、优势和局限性。实证研究结果表明,需求工程技术之间具有较高的竞争力,且各技术之间的得分差异不大。统计显示,访谈技术是所有技术中得分最高的,其次是JAD和头脑风暴技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信