Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in Ambulatory Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis.

Kirsten Potter, R. Bowling, L. Kavanagh, Ashley Stone, Brittany Witt, A. Wooldridge
{"title":"Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in Ambulatory Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Kirsten Potter, R. Bowling, L. Kavanagh, Ashley Stone, Brittany Witt, A. Wooldridge","doi":"10.3138/PTC-2018-0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MBT) in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Method: A total of 32 pwMS completed a questionnaire on disease severity, the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), and the MBT. The MBT was re-administered 1 week later. Results: The interrater and test-retest reliability of the total MBT and subscales were excellent. The standard error of measurement for the total MBT, calculated from test-retest and interrater reliability, respectively, was 1.32 and 1.07. The minimal detectable change (MDC) for the total MBT was 3.74; the MDC for the subscales ranged from 0.98 (sensory) to 2.38 (gait). The correlations between individual subscale scores and the total MBT, among subscales, and between the total MBT and disease severity and ABC were excellent. Correlations between the total MBT and age, MS type, and fall and imbalance histories were moderate. Disease severity and ABC scores were the strongest predictors of MBT score. No floor effects were found. Ceiling effects were found for two subscales, but not for the total MBT. Conclusions: The MBT is reliable and valid in pwMS. MDC values will facilitate assessing the effectiveness of treatment. Because ceiling effects were found for two subscales, but not the total MBT, it is recommended that clinicians administer the MBT in its entirety.","PeriodicalId":390485,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/PTC-2018-0071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MBT) in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Method: A total of 32 pwMS completed a questionnaire on disease severity, the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), and the MBT. The MBT was re-administered 1 week later. Results: The interrater and test-retest reliability of the total MBT and subscales were excellent. The standard error of measurement for the total MBT, calculated from test-retest and interrater reliability, respectively, was 1.32 and 1.07. The minimal detectable change (MDC) for the total MBT was 3.74; the MDC for the subscales ranged from 0.98 (sensory) to 2.38 (gait). The correlations between individual subscale scores and the total MBT, among subscales, and between the total MBT and disease severity and ABC were excellent. Correlations between the total MBT and age, MS type, and fall and imbalance histories were moderate. Disease severity and ABC scores were the strongest predictors of MBT score. No floor effects were found. Ceiling effects were found for two subscales, but not for the total MBT. Conclusions: The MBT is reliable and valid in pwMS. MDC values will facilitate assessing the effectiveness of treatment. Because ceiling effects were found for two subscales, but not the total MBT, it is recommended that clinicians administer the MBT in its entirety.
动态多发性硬化症患者迷你平衡评估系统测试的信度、效度和反应性。
目的:本研究的目的是确定Mini-Balance评估系统测试(MBT)在多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者中的信度、效度和反应性。方法:32例pwMS完成疾病严重程度、活动特异性平衡置信度量表(ABC)和MBT问卷调查。1周后再次给予MBT。结果:总量表和子量表的解释信度和重测信度均较好。总MBT的测量标准误差分别由重测和互测者信度计算得出,分别为1.32和1.07。总MBT的最小可检测变化(MDC)为3.74;亚量表的MDC范围从0.98(感觉)到2.38(步态)。个体子量表得分与总MBT、各子量表之间、总MBT与疾病严重程度和ABC之间的相关性均极好。总MBT与年龄、MS类型、跌倒和失衡史之间的相关性中等。疾病严重程度和ABC评分是MBT评分的最强预测因子。没有发现地板效应。在两个子量表中发现了天花板效应,但在总MBT中没有。结论:MBT在pwMS中是可靠、有效的。MDC值将有助于评估治疗的有效性。因为天花板效应是在两个子量表中发现的,但不是在总MBT中发现的,所以建议临床医生在整个MBT中进行管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信