Book review: La storia dell’arte dopo l’autocoscienza. A partire dal diario di Carla Lonzi [The History of Art after Consciousness-Raising Starting from Carla Lonzi’s Diary]

L. Conte
{"title":"Book review: La storia dell’arte dopo l’autocoscienza. A partire dal diario di Carla Lonzi [The History of Art after Consciousness-Raising Starting from Carla Lonzi’s Diary]","authors":"L. Conte","doi":"10.1177/13505068221104225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"setting goals, direct contact with colleagues, propensity to negotiate rather than order, and so on. In other words, Gurovska suggests that women in management positions subconsciously approach the companies they run as extended families. Their goals are more about the survival, sustainability and longevity of the company, than gaining fast financial results. Sociology of Women’s Labour is one of the pioneering attempts to contribute to the establishment of a new sociological sub discipline based on Sociology of Work. Unlike authors like Caroline Gatrell, who researches the same topic from a feminist perspective, Gurovska, has an understanding of feminist positions, but is more influenced by the sociology of work in the selection and analysis of topics. Although she is both a sociologist and a feminist, she approaches the topics of women’s labor more as a sociologist than as a feminist. However, this does not mean that Gurovska does not apply a feminist approach, but only that it is applied in parallel with the sociological one. It can be said that the Sociology of Woman’s Labor is an example that points to the compatibility of the sociological and feminist approaches. Hence this book can be seen as a feminist sociology of labor. In that sense, Gurovska’s book is more like the one published by Sarah Damaske, “For the Family? How Class and Gender Shape Women’s Work”. This book is primarily written for a Macedonian readership and for sociology students, but it deserves to be translated into English, so that a wider readership can get acquainted with its results. Translations of books such as Sociology of Woman’s Labour, from smaller cultures, can help to illuminate how global themes are understood, analyzed and interpreted in local cultures and can contribute to bringing local specifics from different environments into the analysis of universal topics such as women’s labor, helping to ‘decolonize’ knowledge.","PeriodicalId":312959,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Women's Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Women's Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068221104225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

setting goals, direct contact with colleagues, propensity to negotiate rather than order, and so on. In other words, Gurovska suggests that women in management positions subconsciously approach the companies they run as extended families. Their goals are more about the survival, sustainability and longevity of the company, than gaining fast financial results. Sociology of Women’s Labour is one of the pioneering attempts to contribute to the establishment of a new sociological sub discipline based on Sociology of Work. Unlike authors like Caroline Gatrell, who researches the same topic from a feminist perspective, Gurovska, has an understanding of feminist positions, but is more influenced by the sociology of work in the selection and analysis of topics. Although she is both a sociologist and a feminist, she approaches the topics of women’s labor more as a sociologist than as a feminist. However, this does not mean that Gurovska does not apply a feminist approach, but only that it is applied in parallel with the sociological one. It can be said that the Sociology of Woman’s Labor is an example that points to the compatibility of the sociological and feminist approaches. Hence this book can be seen as a feminist sociology of labor. In that sense, Gurovska’s book is more like the one published by Sarah Damaske, “For the Family? How Class and Gender Shape Women’s Work”. This book is primarily written for a Macedonian readership and for sociology students, but it deserves to be translated into English, so that a wider readership can get acquainted with its results. Translations of books such as Sociology of Woman’s Labour, from smaller cultures, can help to illuminate how global themes are understood, analyzed and interpreted in local cultures and can contribute to bringing local specifics from different environments into the analysis of universal topics such as women’s labor, helping to ‘decolonize’ knowledge.
图书评论:自我意识之后的艺术史。从卡拉·朗齐的日记开始
设定目标,与同事直接接触,倾向于谈判而不是命令,等等。换句话说,Gurovska认为,处于管理职位的女性潜意识里会像对待大家庭一样对待自己经营的公司。他们的目标更多的是关于公司的生存、可持续发展和长寿,而不是获得快速的财务结果。妇女劳动社会学是在劳动社会学基础上建立一门新的社会学分支学科的开创性尝试之一。与Caroline Gatrell等从女性主义角度研究同一主题的作者不同,Gurovska理解女性主义的立场,但在选题和分析上更多地受到工作社会学的影响。虽然她既是社会学家又是女权主义者,但她更多地是以社会学家而不是女权主义者的身份来研究女性劳动问题。然而,这并不意味着Gurovska不应用女权主义方法,而只是将其与社会学方法并行应用。可以说,《妇女劳动社会学》是一个例证,它指出了社会学和女性主义研究方法的兼容性。因此,这本书可以看作是一部女性主义劳动社会学。从这个意义上说,古罗夫斯卡的书更像是莎拉·达马斯基(Sarah Damaske)出版的《为了家庭?阶级和性别如何塑造妇女的工作”。这本书主要是为马其顿读者和社会学学生写的,但它值得被翻译成英文,以便更广泛的读者可以了解它的结果。《妇女劳动社会学》等书籍的翻译来自较小的文化,可以帮助阐明如何在当地文化中理解、分析和解释全球主题,并有助于将来自不同环境的当地特点纳入对妇女劳动等普遍主题的分析,从而帮助知识“去殖民化”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信