WiFi and BLE Fingerprinting for Smartphone Proximity Detection

T. Javornik, Stefan Kalabakov, A. Švigelj
{"title":"WiFi and BLE Fingerprinting for Smartphone Proximity Detection","authors":"T. Javornik, Stefan Kalabakov, A. Švigelj","doi":"10.1109/ELECS55825.2022.00029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wireless devices such as smartphones, wireless bracelets or smartwatches are now often used by a single person. They can therefore be used to model human contact, proximity to each other, or social networking. In light of events such as the recent pandemic interactions or proximity between people have become increasingly important. In this context, this paper explores the limitations of a machine learning-based approach that detects the proximity of two devices (up to about two metres) based on WiFi and BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) fingerprints of their radio environments. Specifically, we compare the use of a rudimentary set of two features and an extended, more complex set of features, exploring the use of separate classifiers that treat WiFi and BLE features separately. In addition, we investigate whether using only one of the two communication technologies for detection could lead to better results and the importance of radio propagation expertise in feature extraction. We found that using a more complex set of features that can be subjected to further feature selection procedures can provide a performance benefit of about 4.6 percentage points. In terms of the communication technologies used, our results also show that using BLE alone always leads to significantly worse results than using WiFi alone or WiFi and BLE together. The evaluation was carried out in three different radio environments, namely indoors in companies, outdoors on the street and in the staircase of residential building with many apartments.","PeriodicalId":320259,"journal":{"name":"2022 6th European Conference on Electrical Engineering & Computer Science (ELECS)","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 6th European Conference on Electrical Engineering & Computer Science (ELECS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELECS55825.2022.00029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wireless devices such as smartphones, wireless bracelets or smartwatches are now often used by a single person. They can therefore be used to model human contact, proximity to each other, or social networking. In light of events such as the recent pandemic interactions or proximity between people have become increasingly important. In this context, this paper explores the limitations of a machine learning-based approach that detects the proximity of two devices (up to about two metres) based on WiFi and BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) fingerprints of their radio environments. Specifically, we compare the use of a rudimentary set of two features and an extended, more complex set of features, exploring the use of separate classifiers that treat WiFi and BLE features separately. In addition, we investigate whether using only one of the two communication technologies for detection could lead to better results and the importance of radio propagation expertise in feature extraction. We found that using a more complex set of features that can be subjected to further feature selection procedures can provide a performance benefit of about 4.6 percentage points. In terms of the communication technologies used, our results also show that using BLE alone always leads to significantly worse results than using WiFi alone or WiFi and BLE together. The evaluation was carried out in three different radio environments, namely indoors in companies, outdoors on the street and in the staircase of residential building with many apartments.
WiFi和BLE指纹识别智能手机接近检测
智能手机、无线手环或智能手表等无线设备现在通常由一个人使用。因此,它们可以用来模拟人类接触、彼此接近或社交网络。鉴于最近的大流行等事件,人与人之间的互动或接近变得越来越重要。在此背景下,本文探讨了基于机器学习的方法的局限性,该方法基于无线环境的WiFi和BLE(低功耗蓝牙)指纹检测两个设备(最多两米)的接近程度。具体来说,我们比较了两个基本特征集和一个扩展的、更复杂的特征集的使用,探索了分别对待WiFi和BLE特征的单独分类器的使用。此外,我们还研究了仅使用两种通信技术中的一种进行检测是否可以获得更好的结果,以及无线电传播专业知识在特征提取中的重要性。我们发现,使用一组更复杂的特征,这些特征可以经受进一步的特征选择过程,可以提供大约4.6个百分点的性能优势。在使用的通信技术方面,我们的研究结果也表明,单独使用BLE的效果总是明显差于单独使用WiFi或WiFi与BLE结合使用。评估在三种不同的无线电环境中进行,即室内公司,室外街道和有许多公寓的住宅楼的楼梯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信