Tattoo detection based on CNN and remarks on the NIST database

Qingyong Xu, Soham Ghosh, Xingpeng Xu, Yi Huang, A. Kong
{"title":"Tattoo detection based on CNN and remarks on the NIST database","authors":"Qingyong Xu, Soham Ghosh, Xingpeng Xu, Yi Huang, A. Kong","doi":"10.1109/ICB.2016.7550050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detecting tattoo images stored in information technology (IT) devices of suspects is an important but challenging task for law enforcement agencies. Recently, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) held a challenge and released a tattoo database for the commercial and academic community in advancing research and development into automated image-based tattoo recognition technology. The best tattoo detection result in the NIST challenge was achieved by MorphoTrak with accuracy of 96.3%. This paper aims to answer three questions. 1) Is the NIST database suitable for training algorithms to detect tattoo images stored in IT devices of suspects? 2) Can convolutional neural networks (CNNs) outperform the MorphoTrak's algorithm? 3) How do training databases impact on tattoo detection performance? The NIST tattoo detection database containing 2,349 images and a database containing 10,000 collected from Flickr are utilized to answer these questions. The Flickr images taken in diverse environments and poses are used to simulate images stored in the IT devices. A CNN is trained on the NIST and Flickr images for this study. The experimental results demonstrate that the CNN outperforms the MorphoTrak's algorithm by 2.5%, achieving accuracy of 98.8% on the NIST database. When the CNN is trained on the NIST database to detect Flickr images, the accuracy drops to 65.8%. It implies that the NIST database is not an ideal database for training algorithms to detect tattoo images in IT devices of suspects. However, when the training database size increases, the detection performance improves.","PeriodicalId":308715,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB)","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICB.2016.7550050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Detecting tattoo images stored in information technology (IT) devices of suspects is an important but challenging task for law enforcement agencies. Recently, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) held a challenge and released a tattoo database for the commercial and academic community in advancing research and development into automated image-based tattoo recognition technology. The best tattoo detection result in the NIST challenge was achieved by MorphoTrak with accuracy of 96.3%. This paper aims to answer three questions. 1) Is the NIST database suitable for training algorithms to detect tattoo images stored in IT devices of suspects? 2) Can convolutional neural networks (CNNs) outperform the MorphoTrak's algorithm? 3) How do training databases impact on tattoo detection performance? The NIST tattoo detection database containing 2,349 images and a database containing 10,000 collected from Flickr are utilized to answer these questions. The Flickr images taken in diverse environments and poses are used to simulate images stored in the IT devices. A CNN is trained on the NIST and Flickr images for this study. The experimental results demonstrate that the CNN outperforms the MorphoTrak's algorithm by 2.5%, achieving accuracy of 98.8% on the NIST database. When the CNN is trained on the NIST database to detect Flickr images, the accuracy drops to 65.8%. It implies that the NIST database is not an ideal database for training algorithms to detect tattoo images in IT devices of suspects. However, when the training database size increases, the detection performance improves.
基于CNN和NIST数据库注释的纹身检测
检测存储在信息技术(IT)设备中的犯罪嫌疑人的纹身图像是执法机构的一项重要但具有挑战性的任务。最近,美国国家标准与技术研究所(NIST)发起了一项挑战,为商业和学术界发布了一个纹身数据库,以推进基于图像的自动纹身识别技术的研究和开发。在NIST挑战中,MorphoTrak的纹身检测结果最好,准确率为96.3%。本文旨在回答三个问题。1) NIST数据库是否适合训练算法来检测存储在嫌疑人IT设备中的纹身图像?2)卷积神经网络(cnn)能胜过MorphoTrak的算法吗?3)训练数据库如何影响纹身检测性能?NIST纹身检测数据库包含2349张图片,数据库包含从Flickr收集的10000张图片,用来回答这些问题。在不同环境和姿势下拍摄的Flickr图像用于模拟存储在IT设备中的图像。CNN在NIST和Flickr图片上进行了训练。实验结果表明,CNN比MorphoTrak算法高出2.5%,在NIST数据库上达到98.8%的准确率。当CNN在NIST数据库上进行训练以检测Flickr图像时,准确率下降到65.8%。这意味着NIST数据库不是一个理想的数据库,用于训练算法来检测嫌疑人It设备中的纹身图像。然而,当训练数据库的规模增大时,检测性能会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信