Distributing Parental Duties

T. Fowler
{"title":"Distributing Parental Duties","authors":"T. Fowler","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvwrm4bm.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, I consider the special duties that some adults have to children and defend what is known as the causal theory. According to this account, people come to have duties to children because they create them in a needy state, and effectively make profound choices on behalf of their children. I show why this view is preferable to both the voluntariness view – according to which people can only have special duties when they agree to them – and to the social conventions account – which suggests that special duties are whatever the social conventions state them to be. Finally, I show how the causal view can dodge the problem of assigning too many people as the relevant causes of children, and thus as that child’s parents.","PeriodicalId":192204,"journal":{"name":"Liberalism, Childhood and Justice","volume":"207 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liberalism, Childhood and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvwrm4bm.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this chapter, I consider the special duties that some adults have to children and defend what is known as the causal theory. According to this account, people come to have duties to children because they create them in a needy state, and effectively make profound choices on behalf of their children. I show why this view is preferable to both the voluntariness view – according to which people can only have special duties when they agree to them – and to the social conventions account – which suggests that special duties are whatever the social conventions state them to be. Finally, I show how the causal view can dodge the problem of assigning too many people as the relevant causes of children, and thus as that child’s parents.
分配父母责任
在这一章中,我考虑了一些成年人对孩子的特殊责任,并为所谓的因果理论辩护。根据这种说法,人们对孩子有责任是因为他们把孩子创造在一个需要的状态,并有效地代表他们的孩子做出深刻的选择。我将说明为什么这种观点比自愿性观点和社会习俗观点更可取。自愿性观点认为,人们只有在同意的情况下才能承担特殊义务,而社会习俗认为,特殊义务是社会习俗所规定的。最后,我展示了因果观是如何避免将太多的人作为孩子的相关原因,从而作为孩子的父母的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信